Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19713630›Full record

ReviewWork (Reading, Mass.)2009

Human factors and ergonomics in home care: Current concerns and future considerations for health information technology.

Calvin K L Or, Rupa S Valdez, Gail R Casper, Pascale Carayon, Laura J Burke, Patricia Flatley Brennan, Ben-Tzion Karsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Future Research in Health Information Technology: A Review.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Calvin K L OrDepartment of Manufacturing Engineering & Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Rupa S Valdez
Gail R Casper
Pascale Carayon
Laura J Burke
Patricia Flatley Brennan
Ben-Tzion Karsh

Funding

CUSTOMIZED COMPUTER SUPPORT--HOME CARE OF CABG PATIENTSR01LM006249 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BRENNAN, PATRICIA F · 1997 to 2007
$1.6M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006249NLM NIH HHS R01-LM6249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sicker patients with greater care needs are being discharged to their homes to assume responsibility for their own care with fewer nurses available to aid them. This situation brings with it a host of human factors and ergonomic (HFE) concerns, both for the home care nurse and the home dwelling patient, that can affect quality of care and patient safety. Many of these concerns are related to the critical home care tasks of information access, communication, and patient self-monitoring and self-management. Currently, a variety of health information technologies (HITs) are being promoted as possible solutions to those problems, but those same technologies bring with them a new set of HFE concerns. This paper reviews the HFE considerations for information access, communication, and patients self-monitoring and self-management, discusses how HIT can potentially mitigate current problems, and explains how the design and implementation of HIT itself requires careful HFE attention.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care Information SystemsErgonomicsHome Care ServicesOccupational HealthHumansTelemedicineWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID19713630
PMCPMC2819983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.