Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19712545›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

Practitioners' views on managing childhood obesity in primary care: a qualitative study.

Katrina M Turner, Julian P H Shield, Chris Salisbury

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Evaluating the transferability of a hospital-based childhood obesity clinic to primary care: a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Trial
  5. Is healthy eating for obese children necessarily more costly for families?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Trial
  6. Barriers engaging families and GPs in childhood weight management strategies.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Child health care in general practice: priorities for education and practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  14. Obesity in primary care: a qualitative synthesis of patient and practitioner perspectives on roles and responsibilities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Managing pediatric obesity: barriers and potential solutions.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. How useful are clinical guidelines for the management of obesity in general practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrina M TurnerAcademic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol. katrina.turner@bristol.ac.uk
Julian P H Shield
Chris Salisbury
Primary Health Care · QAUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2006 the Department of Health and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published guidance on the management of childhood obesity, for use by primary care practitioners. Little is known, however, about practitioners' views and experiences of managing childhood obesity in primary care.

aimTo explore practitioners' views of primary care as a setting in which to treat childhood obesity. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative interview study.

settingPrimary care and other community settings based in Bristol, England.

methodInterviews explored practitioners' views and experiences of managing childhood obesity and their knowledge of the recent guidance provided by the Department of Health and NICE. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was thematic and comparisons made both within and across the interviews.

resultsThirty practitioners were interviewed: 12 GPs, 10 practice nurses, four school nurses, and four health visitors. Participants varied in their views about whether primary care is an appropriate treatment setting for childhood obesity. However, all described factors that limited the extent to which they could intervene effectively: a lack of expertise, resources, and contact with primary school children; the causes of childhood obesity; and the need to work with parents. It was also apparent that very few participants had knowledge of the recent guidance.

conclusionPractitioners do not currently view primary care as an effective treatment setting for childhood obesity and it is unlikely that the guidance from the Department of Health and NICE will have a meaningful impact on their management of this condition.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthFamily PracticeAdultChildEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID19712545
PMCPMC2765837
OpenAlexW2070274140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.