ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2009
Disease biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: potential for use in therapeutic decision making.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01626248 (Analysis of Lymphocyte Cell Surface Adhesion Marker Expression in a Natalizumab Treated Population With Active Control Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Lymphocyte Cell Surface Adhesion Marker Expression in a Natalizumab Treated Population With Active Control Assessment
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Association of Axonal Damage Biomarkers and Osteopontin at Diagnosis Could Be Useful in Newly Diagnosed MS Patients.Neurology international · 2025Article
- A novel gene signature for forecasting time to next relapse in multiple sclerosis using peripheral blood mononuclear cells.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Quantitative proteomics and multi-omics analysis identifies potential biomarkers and the underlying pathological molecular networks in Chinese patients with multiple sclerosis.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Identification of genomic biomarkers and their pathway crosstalks for deciphering mechanistic links in glioblastoma.IET systems biology · 2023Article
- Current and Future Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Serum-Based Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration and Multiple Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers Distinguishing Relapsing-Remitting from Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Potential Biomarkers Associated with Multiple Sclerosis Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- KIF5A and the contribution of susceptibility genotypes as a predictive biomarker for multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- The Implication of Reticulons (RTNs) in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Fitness Shifts the Balance of BDNF and IL-6 from Inflammation to Repair among People with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Serum Health Biomarkers in African and Asian Elephants: Value Ranges and Clinical Values Indicative of the Immune Response.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Cellular Prion Protein (PrPc): Putative Interacting Partners and Consequences of the Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Activated monocytes and markers of inflammation in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis.Immunology and cell biology · 2020Article
- Cognitive Dysfunction in the Early Stages of Multiple Sclerosis-How Much and How Important?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020Review
- The preliminary association study of osteopontin 707 C/T polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Polish population.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2020Article
- Predicting therapeutic response to fingolimod treatment in multiple sclerosis patients.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018Article
- Subsets of activated monocytes and markers of inflammation in incipient and progressed multiple sclerosis.Immunology and cell biology · 2018Article
- Butyrylcholinesterase and Acetylcholinesterase polymorphisms in Multiple Sclerosis patients: implication in peripheral inflammation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Sildenafil, a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor, Downregulates Osteopontin in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder of the brain and spinal cord that predominantly affects white matter. MS has a variable clinical presentation and has no 'diagnostic' laboratory test; this often results in delays to definite diagnosis. In confronting the disease, early diagnosis and appropriate, timely therapeutic intervention are critical factors in ensuring favorable long-term outcomes. The availability of reliable biomarkers could radically alter our management of MS at critical phases of the disease spectrum. Identification of markers that could predict the development of MS in high-risk populations would allow for intervention strategies that may prevent evolution to definite disease. Work with anti-myelin antibodies and the ongoing analysis of microarray gene expression have thus far not yielded biomarkers that predict future disease development. Similarly, extensive studies with serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have not yielded a disease-specific and sensitive diagnostic biomarker for MS. Establishment of disease diagnosis always leads to questions about long-term prognosis because in an individual patient the natural history of the disease is clinically unpredictable. Biomarkers that correlate with myelin loss, spinal cord disease, grey matter and subcortical demyelination need to be developed in order to accurately predict the disease course. The bulk of effort in biomarker development in MS has been concentrated in the area of monitoring disease activity. At present, a disease 'activation' panel of CSF biomarkers would include the following: interleukin-6 or its soluble receptor, nitric oxide and nitric oxide synthase, osteopontin, and fetuin-A. Although disease activity in MS is predominantly inflammatory, disease progression is likely to be the result of neurodegeneration. Therefore, the roles of proteins indicative of neuronal, axonal, and glial loss such as neurofilaments, tau, 14-3-3 proteins, and N-acetylaspartate are all under investigation, as are proteins affecting remyelination and regeneration, such as Nogo-A. With the increasing awareness of cognition dysfunction in MS, molecules such as apolipoprotein and proteins in the amyloid precursor protein pathway implicated in dementia are also being examined. Serum biomarkers that help monitor therapeutic efficacy such as the titer of antibody to beta-interferon, a first-line medication in MS, are established in clinical practice. Ongoing work with biomarkers that reflect drug bioavailability and factors that distinguish between medication responders and nonresponders are also under investigation. The discovery of new biomarkers relies on applying advances in proteomics along with microarray gene and antigen analysis and will hopefully result in the establishment of specific biomarkers for MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.