ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2009
Cardiac output and oxygen uptake relationship during physical effort in men and women over 60 years old.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inspiratory muscle training improves physical performance and cardiac autonomic modulation in older women.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Trial
- Cardiopulmonary exercise capacity markers and their link to symptom burden in patients at risk for heart failure with non-reduced ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of clinical prediction models for cardiorespiratory fitness in atrial fibrillation patients following radiofrequency catheter ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Left ventricular stroke volume decreases due to surgical procedures of anatomical lung resection.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Systolic and diastolic function during cycling at the respiratory threshold between elderly and young healthy individuals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Stroke volume and cardiac output during 6 minute-walk tests are strong predictors of maximal oxygen uptake in people after stroke.PloS one · 2022Article
- Are heart rate methods based on ergometer cycling and level treadmill walking interchangeable?PloS one · 2020Article
- Repository Describing an Aging Population to Inform Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models Considering Anatomical, Physiological, and Biological Age-Dependent Changes.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Article
- Cardiac hemodynamic response to the 6-minute walk test in young adults and the elderly.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- Estimating energy expenditure from heart rate in older adults: a case for calibration.PloS one · 2014Article
- Assessment of Cardiorespiratory Fitness without Exercise in Elderly Men with Chronic Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.Journal of aging research · 2012Article
- The slope of the oxygen pulse curve does not depend on the maximal heart rate in elite soccer players.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2011Article
- Walk-run transition in young and older adults: with special reference to the cardio-respiratory responses.European journal of applied physiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between oxygen uptake (VO(2)), cardiac output (Q), stroke volume (SV), and heart rate (HR) in 54 men and 77 women (age = 69 +/- 5 years) during incremental effort. Subjects performed a maximal cycle-ergometer test and VO(2) was directly measured. HR and SV were assessed by ECG and cardiograph impedance. Regression equations were calculated for Q-VO(2), HR-VO(2), and Q-HR relationships. The equations obtained for women were (a) Q (l min(-1)) = 2.61 + 4.67 VO(2) (l min(-1))(r(2) = 0.84); (b) HR (bpm) = 62.03 + 46.55 VO(2) (l min(-1)) (r (2) = 0.72); (c) SV (ml) 100:6[1 - e(-2.6 VO2 (1 min-1))] (r (2) = 0.41); (d) HR (bpm) = 41.48 + 9.24 Q (l min(-1)) (r (2) = 0.73). Equations for men were (a) Q (l min(-1)) = 2.52 + 5.70 VO(2) (l min(-1)) (r (2) = 0.89); (b) HR (bpm) = 66.31 + 32.35 VO(2) (l min(-1)) (r (2) = 0.72); (c) [1 - e(-1.7 VO2 (1 min-1))] (r (2) = 0.47); (d) HR (bpm) = 56.33 + 5.25 Q (l min(-1)) (r (2) = 0.69). The intercepts for Q-VO(2) and HR-VO(2) equations were similar for both genders, but the slopes were different (P < 0.05). The SV increased from baseline to 50-60% of VO(2) peak in both groups. No gender effect was found in SV increasing pattern, but the absolute values were in general higher for men (P > 0.05). A significant difference between men and women was observed for both slopes and intercepts in the Q-HR relationship (P < 0.05). In conclusion, (a) Q-VO(2) relation was linear during progressive effort; (b) regression intercepts were similar, but the slopes were higher for men compared to women; (c) SV-VO(2) relationship was nonlinear and maximum SV was reached at very submaximal workload; (d) older men exhibited higher Q upward potential as well higher SV but lower HR for a given submaximal workload than women of similar age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.