Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19707823›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2010

Ramosetron versus ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Junghee Ryu, Yun-Mi So, Jungwon Hwang, Sang-Hwan Do

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junghee RyuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Kumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Kyonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea.
Yun-Mi So
Jungwon Hwang
Sang-Hwan Do
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy are at high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study compared ramosetron and ondansetron in terms of efficacy for PONV prevention after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsFor this study, 120 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized (in double-blind fashion) to receive 4 mg of ondansetron (group O4, n = 40), 8 mg of ondansetron (group O8, n = 40), or 0.3 mg of ramosetron (group R, n = 40) intravenously after surgery. Postoperative nausea, retching, vomiting, pain, and side effects were assessed at 2 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery.

resultsNo statistical differences were observed among the three groups with regard to patient characteristics and information on surgery and anesthesia. The ratio of complete response (no PONV for 2 h) was higher for groups O8 and R than for group O4 as follows: 80% (n = 32) for groups O8 and R versus 58% (n = 23) for group O4 during the first postoperative 2 h (p = 0.04), 90% (n = 36) for groups O8 and R versus 76% (n = 30) for group O4 over 24 h (2-24 h) (p = 0.09), and 98% (n = 38) for groups O4 and O8 versus 100% (n = 40) for group R over the next 24 h (24-48 h) after surgery (p = 0.36). During the first 2 h after surgery, rescue antiemetics were used for significantly fewer patients in groups O8 and R (20%) than in group O4 (42.5%) (p = 0.04). Postoperative pain and the use of rescue analgesics were comparable among the groups. There was no clinically serious adverse event due to the study drugs.

conclusionRamosetron 0.3 mg and ondansetron 8 mg are more effective than ondansetron 4 mg for the prevention of PONV (2 h). Ramosetron 0.3 mg is as effective as ondansetron 8 mg for the prophylaxis of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAntiemeticsBenzimidazolesChi-Square DistributionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOndansetronPostoperative Nausea and VomitingTreatment OutcomeAntiemeticsBenzimidazolesOndansetronramosetron

Identifiers

PMID19707823
OpenAlexW2013089640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.