Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19707424›Full record

ArticleBiologics : targets & therapy2008

Clinical uses of GM-CSF, a critical appraisal and update.

Martha Arellano, Sagar Lonial

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Treatment of cancer patients with a serotype 5/3 chimeric oncolytic adenovirus expressing GMCSF.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2010
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Decoding Host-Pathogen Dynamics inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anti-Tumor Effects of Vitamin B2, B6 and B9 in Promonocytic Lymphoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha ArellanoEmory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sagar Lonial
Winship Cancer Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the supportive care of cancer patients has been evaluated with promising results. More recently, GM-CSF has been added to regimens for the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. An expanding role for GM-CSF in regulating immune responses has been recognized based upon its activity on the development and maturation of antigen presenting cells and its capability for skewing the immune system toward Th1-type responses. GM-CSF has been shown to preferentially enhance both the numbers and activity of type 1 dendritic cells (DC1), the subsets of dendritic cells responsible for initiating cytotoxic immune responses. The increase in DC1 content and activity following local and systemic GM-CSF administration support a role for GM-CSF as an immune stimulant and vaccine adjuvant in cancer patients. GM-CSF has shown clinical activity as an immune stimulant in tumor cell and dendritic cell vaccines, and may increase antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The successful use of myeloid acting cytokines to enhance anti-tumor responses will likely require the utilization of GM-CSF in combination with cytotoxic or other targeted therapies.

Indexed as

cancerG-CSFGM-CSFhematopoietic cytokines

Identifiers

PMID19707424
PMCPMC2727781
OpenAlexW2079664601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.