Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19705212›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Stress/rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients without significant coronary artery disease.

Umar Adamu, Daniela Knollmann, Bader Almutairi, Wael Alrawashdeh, Verena Deserno, Felix Vogt, Eduard Kleinhans, Wolfgang M Schäfer, Rainer Hoffmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Prediction of outcome byJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Can myocardial perfusion imaging predict outcome in patients with angina and ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA)?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with D-SPECT camera in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA).Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion abnormalities for long-term prognosis in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography in risk assessment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2011
    Review
  12. Imaging as an End Point in Ischemia Trials.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2011
    Article
  13. Comparative roles of cardiac CT and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease: competitive or complementary.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2010
    Review
  14. Abnormal myocardial perfusion in the absence of anatomically significant coronary artery disease: implications and clinical significance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Umar AdamuMedical Clinic I, University RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057, Aachen, Germany.
Daniela Knollmann
Bader Almutairi
Wael Alrawashdeh
Verena Deserno
Felix Vogt
Eduard Kleinhans
Wolfgang M Schäfer
Rainer Hoffmann
RWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo define the prognostic impact of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in patients with angiographic exclusion of significant coronary artery disease.

methodsAngiographic and MPS databases were matched to define patients without significant coronary artery disease by quantitative angiography (diameter stenosis <50%) who underwent stress MPS and coronary angiography within a time period of 3 months. A total of 118 patients were identified and followed for a mean of 6.3 +/- 1.2 years for death, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or percutaneous coronary intervention [MAE]) as well as occurrence of symptoms (angina or dyspnoe class CCS II to IV). Stress and rest MPS (using (99m)Tc-MIBI or tetrofosmin) were analyzed by quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) for summed stress and rest scores (SSS/SRS).

resultsThere were 16 deaths, 29 MAE, and 76 patients with MAE or significant symptoms during follow-up. Significant differences in SSS were found between patients who died (9.5 +/- 6.9 vs. 5.4 +/- 5.6, P = 0.012), had MAE (8.7 +/- 7.2 vs. 5.2 +/- 5.0, P = 0.010), or had MAE or significant clinical symptoms (7.2 +/- 7.1 vs. 4.6 +/- 6.2, P = 0.042) compared to those without the respective event. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated SSS to be a predictor of death (OR = 1.074 [95% CI: 1.004-1.149], P = 0.026) and MAE (OR = 1.087 [95% CI: 1.004-1.181], P = 0.027).

conclusionsIn patients without significant angiographic coronary artery disease, the result of stress MPS is a predictor of long-term prognosis. Quantitative analysis of MPS allows definition of patients with a higher likelihood to develop clinical events or symptoms.

Indexed as

ComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseExercise TestFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingMyocardial StunningRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsRestRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID19705212
OpenAlexW2066041693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.