Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19705165›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2010

What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care?-a systematic review.

Clare White, Janet Hardy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04894162 (Participating in Palliative Care Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04894162 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Participating in Palliative Care Research

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustRan2021 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsPalliative Care, Terminal Illness, Hospice CareArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Conducting a randomized controlled clinical trial on palliative care in patients with glioblastoma - what are the challenges?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The effect of multiple recruitment contacts on response rates and patterns of missing data in a survey of bladder cancer survivors 6 months after cystectomy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clare WhiteNorthern Ireland Hospice Care, Belfast, 3LH, Northern Ireland. clarewhite100@hotmail.com
Janet Hardy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch in palliative care patients has been controversial and is often challenging. It is important to know the views of potentially eligible patients themselves in order to determine the appropriateness of research in the palliative care population and to develop realistic studies that are practical and achievable in this population. This systematic review aims to identify the views of palliative care patients and their families towards research, the factors that are important when considering participation, and the types of research trial they would support or reject.

methodsA systematic literature review was undertaken to identify what is known to date regarding the views of palliative care patients and their relatives towards research participation. Eight relevant studies were identified. DISCUSSION: There is an increasing body of evidence considering the views of palliative care patients towards research in palliative care. However, only three studies have considered the views of their relatives/caregivers. Several common themes emerged from the literature including the potential for personal gain, altruism, the wish to avoid complex studies and a desire to retain autonomy. Trial-related factors were also important determinants of willingness of patients and relatives to participate in research. The views expressed by palliative care patients towards research are similar to those of other patient populations.

conclusionResearch to date in the palliative care setting has suggested that patients are interested in participating in research and may actually benefit from doing so.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicData CollectionHumansPalliative CarePatient ParticipationPersonal Autonomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.