Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19705105›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2009

Effects of sedative and nonsedative antihistamines on prefrontal activity during verbal fluency task in young children: a near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study.

Takeo Tsujii, Sayako Masuda, Eriko Yamamoto, Takayuki Ohira, Takekazu Akiyama, Takao Takahashi, Shigeru Watanabe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeo TsujiiCenter for Advanced Research on Logic and Sensibility, Keio University, Mita 3-1-7, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0073, Japan. tuji@flet.keio.ac.jp
Sayako Masuda
Eriko Yamamoto
Takayuki Ohira
Takekazu Akiyama
Takao Takahashi
Shigeru Watanabe
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntagonists of histamine H(1) receptors (antihistamines) are widely used for the treatment of allergic disorders in children. These drugs' sedative effect on brain function, however, has been mostly examined in adults.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the effects of anitihistamines on prefrontal cortex activity in young children using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), a novel brain-imaging method. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 15 healthy children (mean age, 7.7 years), we examined changes of oxygenated hemoglobin concentration in the prefrontal cortex while they performed a verbal fluency task 3 h after taking a sedating antihistamine (ketotifen), nonsedating antihistamine (epinastine), or placebo.

resultsKetotifen significantly impaired behavioral performance and cortical activation at the lateral prefrontal cortex compared with placebo. There were no sedative effects on neural response or behavioral performance after epinastine administration.

conclusionsNIRS revealed that sedating and nonsedating antihistamines exert differential effects on brain hemodynamic response in young children.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceChildCross-Over StudiesDibenzazepinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemoglobinsHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansImidazolesKetotifenLanguage TestsMaleOxyhemoglobinsPrefrontal CortexSpectroscopy, Near-InfrareddeoxyhemoglobinDibenzazepinesepinastineHemoglobinsHistamine H1 AntagonistsImidazolesKetotifenOxyhemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID19705105
OpenAlexW2006475869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.