Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19704857›Full record

ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2009

The many facets of adaptation in fly visual motion processing.

Rafael Kurtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rafael KurtzDepartment of Neurobiology; Bielefeld University; Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal adaptation has been studied extensively in visual motion-sensitive neurons of the fly Calliphora vicina, a model system in which the computational principles of visual motion processing are amenable on a single-cell level. Evidenced by several recent papers, the original idea had to be dismissed that motion adaptation adjusts velocity coding to the current stimulus range by a simple parameter change in the motion detection scheme. In contrast, linear encoding of velocity modulations and total information rates might even go down in the course of adaptation. Thus it seems that rather than improving absolute velocity encoding motion adaptation might bring forward an efficient extraction of those features in the visual input signal that are most relevant for visually guided course control and obstacle avoidance.

Indexed as

adaptationelectrophysiologyflyinvertebratemotion visionneural computation

Identifiers

PMID19704857
PMCPMC2649291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.