ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2008
Enhancement of post-transcriptional gene silencing by grafting.
Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grafting: a potential method to reveal the differential accumulation mechanism of secondary metabolites.Horticulture research · 2022Article
- The Role of Grafting in the Resistance of Tomato to Viruses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Peptide encoding Populus CLV3/ESR-RELATED 47 (PttCLE47) promotes cambial development and secondary xylem formation in hybrid aspen.The New phytologist · 2020Article
- Grafting alters tomato transcriptome and enhances tolerance to an airborne virus infection.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We showed previously that grafting transmitted silencing occurred when transgenic ACC oxidase 1 (ACO1) overexpressing tomato plants that also produced siRNAs were grafted onto transgenic stocks that already showed strong silencing. The presence of siRNAs in these overexpressing scions may indicate that silencing, though inefficient, may already occur at a low level before grafting. To test if a silencing state with a relatively high level of target mRNA can be shifted towards further more effective silencing, we grafted an ACO1 antisense (AS) line with a high level of antisense ACO1 transgene mRNA and low level of siRNAs to the ACO1 strong silencer stock. The AS mRNA level was reduced dramatically two weeks after grafting. More interestingly, self-grafting of ACO1 overexpressers and AS lines also induced strong silencing in the scions. We suggest that grafting transmitted silencing may involve the switching from an inefficient or weak silencing state to a stronger silencing by a systemic silencing signal, similar to the change of silencing states that sometimes occurs during development. Control experiments using non-transgenic stocks designed to test whether wounding alone is responsible for generating a signal that enhances silencing in transgenic scions gave negative results. We propose that the build-up of silencing signal and/or molecules at both sides of the grafting junction and their sudden release when the phloem is reconnected may be critical to grafting transmitted silencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.