ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2009
Context-independent, temperature-dependent helical propensities for amino acid residues.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomolecular Condensates Dictate the Folding Landscape of Proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A synergy between site-specific and transient interactions drives the phase separation of a disordered, low-complexity domain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Developing Bonded Potentials for a Coarse-Grained Model of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Computational Modeling as a Tool to Investigate PPI: From Drug Design to Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- ff19SB: Amino-Acid-Specific Protein Backbone Parameters Trained against Quantum Mechanics Energy Surfaces in Solution.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2020Article
- Using Cooperatively Folded Peptides To Measure Interaction Energies and Conformational Propensities.Accounts of chemical research · 2017Article
- Advances in free-energy-based simulations of protein folding and ligand binding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2016Review
- Grid-based backbone correction to the ff12SB protein force field for implicit-solvent simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015Article
- Dependence of internal friction on folding mechanism.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Protonation-dependent conformational variability of intrinsically disordered proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2013Article
- Inclusion of many-body effects in the additive CHARMM protein CMAP potential results in enhanced cooperativity of α-helix and β-hairpin formation.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Residue-specific α-helix propensities from molecular simulation.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Deciphering the preference and predicting the viability of circular permutations in proteins.PloS one · 2012Article
- Dissecting the functions of conserved prolines within transmembrane helices of the D2 dopamine receptor.ACS chemical biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assigned from data sets measured in water at 2, 25, and 60 degrees C containing (13)C=O NMR chemical shifts and [theta](222) ellipticities, helical propensities are reported for the 20 genetically coded amino acids, as well as for norvaline and norleucine. These have been introduced by chemical synthesis at central sites within length-optimized, spaced, solubilized Ala(19) hosts. The resulting polyalanine-derived, quantitative propensity sets express for each residue its temperature-dependent but context-independent tendency to forego a coil state and join a preexisting helical conformation. At 2 degrees C their rank ordering is: P << G < H < C, T, N < S < Y, F, W < V, D < K < Q < I < R, M < L < E < A; at 60 degrees C the rank becomes: H, P < G < C < R, K < T, Y, F < N, V < S < Q < W, D < I, M < E < A < L. The DeltaDeltaG values, kcal/mol, relative to alanine, for the cluster T, N, S, Y, F, W, V, D, Q, imply that at 2 degrees C all are strong breakers: DeltaDeltaG(mean) = +0.63 +/- 0.11, but at 60 degrees C their breaking tendencies are dramatically attenuated and converge toward the mean: DeltaDeltaG(mean) = +0.25 +/- 0.07. Accurate modeling of helix-rich proteins found in thermophiles, mesophiles, and organisms that flourish near 0 degrees C thus requires appropriately matched propensity sets. Comparisons are offered between the temperature-dependent propensity assignments of this study and those previously assigned by the Scheraga group; the special problems that attend propensity assignments for charged residues are illustrated by lysine guest data; and comparisons of errors in helicity assignments from shifts and ellipticity data show that the former provide superior precision and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.