ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2009
Barrier-focused intervention to increase colonoscopy attendance among nonadherent high-risk populations.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation research on common cancers (lung, breast, and colorectal) in Asia - a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation research on noncommunicable disease prevention and control interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Robust performance of a novel stool DNA test of methylated SDC2 for colorectal cancer detection: a multicenter clinical study.Clinical epigenetics · 2020Trial
- Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018Trial
- Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Promoting Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy Among Persons in HIV Primary Care: A Pilot Study.Clinical and translational science · 2015Trial
- Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- High-Yield Methylation Markers for Stool-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- The role ofBMC cancer · 2019Article
- How to improve colon cancer screening rates.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2015Review
- Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening protocols in urban Chinese populations.PloS one · 2014Article
- Demonstration of a sucrose-derived contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the GI tract.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2013Article
- Serum M2-pyruvate kinase: A promising non-invasive biomarker for colorectal cancer mass screening.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2012Article
- Performance value of high risk factors in colorectal cancer screening in China.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo increase attendance for colonoscopy among nonadherent high-risk individuals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in China.
methodsDuring the first 12 mo without intervention, only 428 of the 2398 high-risk subjects attended a scheduled colonoscopy examination. The 1970 subjects who did not attend for CRC screening were enrolled in the present study. Prior barrier investigation was performed to ascertain the reasons for nonadherence. A barrier-focused intervention program was then established and implemented among eligible nonadherent subjects by telephone interviews and on-site consultations. The completion rates of colonoscopy during the first 12 mo without intervention and the second 12 mo with intervention were compared. Variations in the effect of the intervention on some high-risk factors and barrier characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression.
results540 subjects who were not eligible were excluded from the study. The colonoscopy attendance rate was 23.04% (428/1858) during the first 12 mo without intervention, and 37.69% (539/1430) during the second 12 mo with intervention (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the intervention was more effective among subjects with only objective barriers (OR: 34.590, 95% CI: 23.204-51.563) or subjects with some specific high-risk characteristics: first-degree relatives diagnosed with CRC (OR: 1.778, 95% CI: 1.010-3.131), personal history of intestinal polyps (OR: 3.815, 95% CI: 1.994-7.300) and positive result for immunochemical fecal occult blood testing (OR: 2.718, 95% CI: 1.479-4.996).
conclusionThe barrier-focused telephone or on-site consultation intervention appears to be a feasible means to improve colonoscopy attendance among nonadherent high-risk subjects for CRC screening in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.