Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19700619›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2009

Evolving enhancer-promoter interactions within the tinman complex of the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Jessica Doran Cande, Vivek S Chopra, Michael Levine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhancer adoption caused by genomic insertion elicits interdigitalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Making connections: insulators organize eukaryotic chromosomes into independent cis-regulatory networks.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  15. Assessing constraints on the path of regulatory sequence evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  16. Evolution of transcriptional enhancers and animal diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  17. From remote enhancers to gene regulation: charting the genome's regulatory landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  18. Transcriptional repression via antilooping in the Drosophila embryo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jessica Doran CandeDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Division of Genetics, Genomics and Development, Center for Integrative Genomics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Vivek S Chopra
Michael Levine
Innovative Genomics Institute · US

Funding

MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DORSAL MORPHOGENR37GM046638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LEVINE, MICHAEL STEVEN · 2003 to 2012
$3.8M
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DORSAL MORPHOGENR01GM046638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI LEVINE, MICHAEL STEVEN · 1991 to 2016
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM46638NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications of cis-regulatory DNAs, particularly enhancers, underlie changes in gene expression during animal evolution. Here, we present evidence for a distinct mechanism of regulatory evolution, whereby a novel pattern of gene expression arises from altered gene targeting of a conserved enhancer. The tinman gene complex (Tin-C) controls the patterning of dorsal mesodermal tissues, including the dorsal vessel or heart in Drosophila. Despite broad conservation of Tin-C gene expression patterns in the flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum), the honeybee (Apis mellifera) and the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), the expression of a key pericardial determinant, ladybird, is absent from the dorsal mesoderm of Tribolium embryos. Evidence is presented that this loss in expression is replaced by expression of C15, the neighboring gene in the complex. This switch in expression from ladybird to C15 appears to arise from an inversion within the tinman complex, which redirects a conserved ladybird 3' enhancer to regulate C15. In Drosophila, this enhancer fails to activate C15 expression owing to the activity of an insulator at the intervening ladybird early promoter. By contrast, a chromosomal inversion allows the cardiac enhancer to bypass the ladybird insulator in Tribolium. Given the high frequency of genome rearrangements in insects, it is possible that such enhancer switching might be widely used in the diversification of the arthropods.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBeesConserved SequenceDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalInsect ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataRepressor ProteinsSequence AlignmentTrans-ActivatorsTriboliumInsect ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID19700619
PMCPMC2730370
OpenAlexW2044641772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.