Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19700545›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2009

Comparative transcriptomic approach to investigate differences in wine yeast physiology and metabolism during fermentation.

Debra Rossouw, Roberto Olivares-Hernandes, Jens Nielsen, Florian F Bauer

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative transcriptional analysis of flavour-biosynthetic genes of a nativeJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2019
    Article
  4. Foldability of a Natural De Novo Evolved Protein.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Flavour-active wine yeasts.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Debra RossouwInstitute for Wine Biotechnology, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Roberto Olivares-Hernandes
Jens Nielsen
Florian F Bauer
Chalmers University of Technology · SEStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial wine yeast strains of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been selected to satisfy many different, and sometimes highly specific, oenological requirements. As a consequence, more than 200 different strains with significantly diverging phenotypic traits are produced globally. This genetic resource has been rather neglected by the scientific community because industrial strains are less easily manipulated than the limited number of laboratory strains that have been successfully employed to investigate fundamental aspects of cellular biology. However, laboratory strains are unsuitable for the study of many phenotypes that are of significant scientific and industrial interest. Here, we investigate whether a comparative transcriptomics and phenomics approach, based on the analysis of five phenotypically diverging industrial wine yeast strains, can provide insights into the molecular networks that are responsible for the expression of such phenotypes. For this purpose, some oenologically relevant phenotypes, including resistance to various stresses, cell wall properties, and metabolite production of these strains were evaluated and aligned with transcriptomic data collected during alcoholic fermentation. The data reveal significant differences in gene regulation between the five strains. While the genetic complexity underlying the various successive stress responses in a dynamic system such as wine fermentation reveals the limits of the approach, many of the relevant differences in gene expression can be linked to specific phenotypic differences between the strains. This is, in particular, the case for many aspects of metabolic regulation. The comparative approach therefore opens new possibilities to investigate complex phenotypic traits on a molecular level.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCarbonCell WallFermentationFlocculationFood MicrobiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenes, FungalMembrane GlycoproteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpecies SpecificityStress, PhysiologicalWineCarbonmannoproteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19700545
PMCPMC2765138
OpenAlexW2142286896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.