Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19699293›Full record

ArticleGenomics2009

Convergent Random Forest predictor: methodology for predicting drug response from genome-scale data applied to anti-TNF response.

Jadwiga R Bienkowska, Gul S Dalgin, Franak Batliwalla, Normand Allaire, Ronenn Roubenoff, Peter K Gregersen, John P Carulli

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jadwiga R BienkowskaBiogen IDEC 14 Cambridge Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. Jadwiga.Bienkowska@biogenidec.com
Gul S Dalgin
Franak Batliwalla
Normand Allaire
Ronenn Roubenoff
Peter K Gregersen
John P Carulli
Biogen (United States) · USNorthwell Health · US

Funding

AUTOIMMUNE BIOMARKERS COLLABORATIVE NETWORK-264012256N01AR012256 · NIAMS · NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITA · 2002 to 2003
–
NIAMS NIH HHS N01 AR012256NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-1-2256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarker development for prediction of patient response to therapy is one of the goals of molecular profiling of human tissues. Due to the large number of transcripts, relatively limited number of samples, and high variability of data, identification of predictive biomarkers is a challenge for data analysis. Furthermore, many genes may be responsible for drug response differences, but often only a few are sufficient for accurate prediction. Here we present an analysis approach, the Convergent Random Forest (CRF) method, for the identification of highly predictive biomarkers. The aim is to select from genome-wide expression data a small number of non-redundant biomarkers that could be developed into a simple and robust diagnostic tool. Our method combines the Random Forest classifier and gene expression clustering to rank and select a small number of predictive genes. We evaluated the CRF approach by analyzing four different data sets. The first set contains transcript profiles of whole blood from rheumatoid arthritis patients, collected before anti-TNF treatment, and their subsequent response to the therapy. In this set, CRF identified 8 transcripts predicting response to therapy with 89% accuracy. We also applied the CRF to the analysis of three previously published expression data sets. For all sets, we have compared the CRF and recursive support vector machines (RSVM) approaches to feature selection and classification. In all cases the CRF selects much smaller number of features, five to eight genes, while achieving similar or better performance on both training and independent testing sets of data. For both methods performance estimates using cross-validation is similar to performance on independent samples. The method has been implemented in R and is available from the authors upon request: Jadwiga.Bienkowska@biogenidec.com.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision TreesGenome-Wide Association StudyAdenocarcinomaAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisDisease ProgressionDrug MonitoringFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID19699293
PMCPMC4476397
OpenAlexW2024800283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.