Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19699165›Full record

ArticleCell stem cell2009

The Drosophila hindgut lacks constitutively active adult stem cells but proliferates in response to tissue damage.

Donald T Fox, Allan C Spradling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stem cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Modelling Cancer in Drosophila: Exploration to Personalised Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Drosophila Intestine as a Model to Study Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Host-Microbe Interactions in Drosophila Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Hallmarks of regeneration.Cell stem cell · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Domesticated LTR-RetrotransposonLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Insect Gut Regeneration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  19. Polyploidy in Tissue Repair and Regeneration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald T FoxDepartment of Embryology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Carnegie Institution, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Allan C Spradling
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult Drosophila hindgut was recently reported to contain active, tissue-replenishing stem cells, like those of the midgut, but located within an anterior ring so as to comprise a single giant crypt. In contrast to this view, we observed no active stem cells and little cell turnover in adult hindgut tissue based on clonal marking and BrdU incorporation studies. Again contradicting the previous proposal, we showed that the adult hindgut is not generated by anterior stem cells during larval/pupal development. However, severe tissue damage within the hindgut elicits cell proliferation within a ring of putative quiescent stem cells at the anterior of the pylorus. Thus, the hindgut does not provide a model of tissue maintenance by constitutively active stem cells, but has great potential to illuminate mechanisms of stress-induced tissue repair.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsbeta-GalactosidaseCell ProliferationClone CellsDigestive SystemDrosophilaIleumLarvaPylorusbeta-Galactosidase

Identifiers

PMID19699165
PMCPMC2772661
OpenAlexW2017520829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.