Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19698805›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2009

Spinal circuitry and respiratory recovery following spinal cord injury.

Michael A Lane, Kun-Ze Lee, David D Fuller, Paul J Reier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An update on spinal cord injury and diaphragm neuromotor control.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. A cholinergic spinal pathway for the adaptive control of breathing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Sex differences in spontaneous respiratory recovery following chronic C2 hemisection.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Spinal Interneurons as Gatekeepers to Neuroplasticity after Injury or Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael A LaneDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Kun-Ze Lee
David D Fuller
Paul J Reier

Funding

Control of Breathing & Glycogen Storage DiseaseR01HD052682 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BYRNE, BARRY J, FULLER, DAVID D · 2007 to 2024
$6.4M
Plasticity and Repair in the Phrenic Motor SystemR01NS054025 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI REIER, PAUL J · 2006 to 2015
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD052682-01A1NICHD NIH HHS HD052682NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD052682NINDS NIH HHS NS054025NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated anatomical and functional neuroplasticity following spinal cord injury. One of the more notable examples is return of ipsilateral phrenic motoneuron and diaphragm activity which can be induced under terminal neurophysiological conditions after high cervical hemisection in the rat. More recently it has been shown that a protracted, spontaneous recovery also occurs in this model. While a candidate neural substrate has been identified for the former, the neuroanatomical basis underlying spontaneous recovery has not been explored. Demonstrations of spinal respiratory interneurons in other species suggest such cells may play a role; however, the presence of interneurons in the adult rat phrenic circuit - the primary animal model of respiratory plasticity - has not been extensively investigated. Emerging neuroanatomical and electrophysiological results raise the possibility of a more complex neural network underlying spontaneous recovery of phrenic function and compensatory respiratory neuroplasticity after C2 hemisection than has been previously considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsCervical VertebraeHumansInterneuronsMotor NeuronsNerve NetPhrenic NerveRecovery of FunctionRespiratory SystemSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID19698805
PMCPMC2783531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.