Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19698734›Full record

Trial reportPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2009

The cardiovascular and subjective effects of methamphetamine combined with gamma-vinyl-gamma-aminobutyric acid (GVG) in non-treatment seeking methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.

Richard De La Garza, Todd Zorick, Keith G Heinzerling, Steve Nusinowitz, Edythe D London, Steven Shoptaw, David E Moody, Thomas F Newton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard De La GarzaBaylor College of Medicine, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA. richard.delagarza@bcm.edu
Todd Zorick
Keith G Heinzerling
Steve Nusinowitz
Edythe D London
Steven Shoptaw
David E Moody
Thomas F Newton
Neurobehavioral Systems · USBaylor College of Medicine · USDoheny Eye Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

ZDV &3TC NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFECTED INFANTS &M01RR000865 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WASHINGTON, ARNOLD E. · 1985 to 2011
$43.4M
UCLA Medication Development Unit for Stimulant AbuseP50DA018185 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHOPTAW, STEVEN J · 2004 to 2009
$5.8M
NEUROCHEMISTRY OF MODAFINIL-MA INTERACTION IN RAT BRAINP20DA022539 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LONDON, EDYTHE DANICK · 2006 to 2009
$2.9M
Assess of Stress Effects in Methamphetamine DependenceK24DA017754 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NEWTON, THOMAS FREDERICK · 2005 to 2010
$727k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000865NCRR NIH HHS RR 00865NIDA NIH HHS DA 022539NIDA NIH HHS DA 18185NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA017754NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA022539NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA018185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma-vinyl-gamma-aminobutyric acid (GVG) elevates central nervous system gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels by irreversibly inhibiting GABA transaminase. An open-label clinical trial in humans suggested that GVG may reduce cocaine and methamphetamine use. To test safety and to obtain preliminary data on efficacy of GVG for treating methamphetamine dependence, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of GVG interaction with the cardiovascular and subjective effects produced by methamphetamine. Non-treatment seeking methamphetamine-dependent volunteers received either GVG (N=8) or placebo (N=9) by random assignment. GVG treatment was initiated at 1 g/day and increased to 5 g/day. After reaching the target dose of 5 g/day, participants received methamphetamine (15+30 mg, IV), and cardiovascular and subjective effects were assessed. No serious adverse events were noted, and the total number of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. Considering the full time course and peak effects independently, no significant differences were detected between the groups for systolic or diastolic blood pressures, or heart rate, following methamphetamine exposure. Some methamphetamine-induced cardiovascular changes approached significance (p<0.10) and may warrant attention in future trials. Methamphetamine-induced subjective effects ("any drug effect", "high", "crave methamphetamine") were statistically similar between GVG and placebo treatment groups. Pharmacokinetic data indicate that GVG treatment did not alter methamphetamine or amphetamine plasma levels, and there was no association between methamphetamine or amphetamine plasma levels and peak cardiovascular effects. Taken together, the data indicate that GVG treatment is generally well tolerated but not efficacious in attenuating the positive subjective effects of methamphetamine in the laboratory.

Indexed as

4-Aminobutyrate TransaminaseAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBlood PressureCardiovascular SystemCentral Nervous System StimulantsDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGABA AgentsHalf-LifeHeart RateHumansMaleMethamphetamineMiddle Aged4-Aminobutyrate TransaminaseCentral Nervous System StimulantsGABA AgentsMethamphetamineVigabatrin

Identifiers

PMID19698734
PMCPMC2775447
OpenAlexW2149969425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.