ArticleAustralia and New Zealand health policy2009
Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.
Article in Australia and New Zealand health policy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Putting research in place: an innovative approach to providing contextualized evidence synthesis for decision makers.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods.Health research policy and systems · 2015Pooled it
- Policy context and narrative leading to the commissioning of the Australian Indigenous Burden of Disease study.Health research policy and systems · 2015Pooled it
- How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.The Milbank quarterly · 2013Pooled it
- Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.The Milbank quarterly · 2010Pooled it
- Cultivating researcher-policymaker partnerships: A randomized controlled trial of a model for training public psychologists.The American psychologist · 2021Trial
- What makes embedded implementation research work? A multicountry synthesis of UNICEF-supported initiatives in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Impact assessment of the ophthalmology discipline construction project at Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Ethics domains in full health technology assessment reports: an attempt to begin mapping the field.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Policy Analysis of Institutionalization of the Social Approach to Health in Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Real-world public health interventions demonstrate how research evidence informs program scale-up.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Research evidence communication for policy-makers: a rapid scoping review on frameworks, guidance and tools, and barriers and facilitators.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Article
- Researchers' views on and practices of knowledge translation: an international survey of transfusion medicine researchers.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Disseminating health research to public health policy-makers and practitioners: a survey of source, message content and delivery modality preferences.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Health promotion and disease prevention registries in the EU: a cross country comparison.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Dissemination of public health research to prevent non-communicable diseases: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2023Article
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBetter communication is often suggested as fundamental to increasing the use of research evidence in policy, but little is known about how researchers and policy makers work together or about barriers to exchange. This study explored the views and practice of policy makers and researchers regarding the use of evidence in policy, including: (i) current use of research to inform policy; (ii) dissemination of and access to research findings for policy; (iii) communication and exchange between researchers and policy makers; and (iv) incentives for increasing the use of research in policy.
methodsSeparate but similar interview schedules were developed for policy makers and researchers. Senior policy makers from NSW Health and senior researchers from public health and health service research groups in NSW were invited to participate. Consenting participants were interviewed by an independent research company.
resultsThirty eight policy makers (79% response rate) and 41 researchers (82% response rate) completed interviews. Policy makers reported rarely using research to inform policy agendas or to evaluate the impact of policy; research was used more commonly to inform policy content. Most researchers reported that their research had informed local policy, mainly by increasing awareness of an issue. Policy makers reported difficulty in accessing useful research syntheses, and only a third of researchers reported developing targeted strategies to inform policy makers of their findings. Both policy makers and researchers wanted more exchange and saw this as important for increasing the use of research evidence in policy; however, both groups reported a high level of involvement by policy makers in research.
conclusionPolicy makers and researchers recognise the potential of research to contribute to policy and are making significant attempts to integrate research into the policy process. These findings suggest four strategies to assist in increasing the use of research in policy: making research findings more accessible to policy makers; increasing opportunities for interaction between policy makers and researchers; addressing structural barriers such as research receptivity in policy agencies and a lack of incentives for academics to link with policy; and increasing the relevance of research to policy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.