Trial reportBMC health services research2009
Implementation of a program for type 2 diabetes based on the Chronic Care Model in a hospital-centered health care system: "the Belgian experience".
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00824499 (Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Complex Regional Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Complex Regional Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Adaptability, Scalability and Sustainability (ASaS) of complex health interventions: a systematic review of theories, models and frameworks.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review.BMC family practice · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2015Pooled it
- Factors influencing contracting of residents with family doctors in China: a national cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- A cohort study of the effects of social support on cerebral cardiovascular disease in subjects with metabolic syndrome.PloS one · 2024Article
- Acceptance of family doctors among residents in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Scale-up of a chronic care model-based programme for type 2 diabetes in Belgium: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Reducing the use of physical restraints in home care: development and feasibility testing of a multicomponent program to support the implementation of a guideline.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Chronic-Care-Management Programs for Multimorbid Patients with Diabetes in Europe: A Scoping Review with the Aim to Identify the Best Practice.Journal of diabetes research · 2021Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on chronic care according to providers: a qualitative study among primary care practices in Belgium.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Assessing the Pilot Implementation of the Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model in Five European Settings: Results from the Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Secondary care clinic for chronic disease: protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2015Article
- Engaging GPs in insulin therapy initiation: a qualitative study evaluating a support program in the Belgian context.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Canadian chronic kidney disease clinics: a national survey of structure, function and models of care.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2014Article
- Disease management projects and the Chronic Care Model in action: baseline qualitative research.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- Needs and barriers to improve the collaboration in oral anticoagulant therapy: a qualitative study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2011Article
- Why do GPs hesitate to refer diabetes patients to a self-management education program: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2011Article
- Applicability of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) instrument in Germany resulting in a new questionnaire: questionnaire of chronic illness care in primary care.BMC health services research · 2011Article
- Assessment of Chronic Illness Care with the German version of the ACIC in different primary care settings in Switzerland.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost research publications on Chronic Care Model (CCM) implementation originate from organizations or countries with a well-structured primary health care system. Information about efforts made in countries with a less well-organized primary health care system is scarce. In 2003, the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance commissioned a pilot study to explore how care for type 2 diabetes patients could be organized in a more efficient way in the Belgian healthcare setting, a setting where the organisational framework for chronic care is mainly hospital-centered.
methodsProcess evaluation of an action research project (2003-2007) guided by the CCM in a well-defined geographical area with 76,826 inhabitants and an estimated number of 2,300 type 2 diabetes patients. In consultation with the region a program for type 2 diabetes patients was developed. The degree of implementation of the CCM in the region was assessed using the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care survey (ACIC). A multimethod approach was used to evaluate the implementation process. The resulting data were triangulated in order to identify the main facilitators and barriers encountered during the implementation process.
resultsThe overall ACIC score improved from 1.45 (limited support) at the start of the study to 5.5 (basic support) at the end of the study. The establishment of a local steering group and the appointment of a program manager were crucial steps in strengthening primary care. The willingness of a group of well-trained and motivated care providers to invest in quality improvement was an important facilitator. Important barriers were the complexity of the intervention, the lack of quality data, inadequate information technology support, the lack of commitment procedures and the uncertainty about sustainable funding.
conclusionGuided by the CCM, this study highlights the opportunities and the bottlenecks for adapting chronic care delivery in a primary care system with limited structure. The study succeeded in achieving a considerable improvement of the overall support for diabetes patients but further improvement requires a shift towards system thinking among policy makers. Currently primary care providers lack the opportunities to take up full responsibility for chronic care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00824499.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.