ArticleBMC family practice2009
The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.
Article in BMC family practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786315 (Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exploring 'VOLITION' in Context - a Study to Inform the Implementation of a New Intervention
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.Health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Depression predicts emergency care use in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a large cohort study in primary care.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Trial
- Patients' use and views of real-time feedback technology in general practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trends in Self-Reported Autism Among Adults in England: Analysis of a Repeated Cross-Sectional Patient Survey Series of 5,999,433 Adults.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties and constructs of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) in primary care: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Patient empowerment outcomes in chronic disease care in Lebanon with validation of a measurement scale and associated determinants.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Self-Reported Long-Term Mental Health Morbidity on Help-Seeking and Diagnostic Testing for Bowel-Related Cancer Symptoms: A Vignette Study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Visit Experience and Fulfillment of Care Needs in Primary Care Differs for Video Visits Compared to In-person and Chat Visits.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Ongoing Decline in Continuity With GPs in English General Practices: A Longitudinal Study Across the COVID-19 Pandemic.Annals of family medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Access to General Practitioners during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: a nationwide survey of doctors.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Access to General Practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal-A survey study of patient experiences in an urban setting.PloS one · 2023Article
- General practitioners' views of advance care planning: a questionnaire-based study.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- The underlying structure of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Factor analysis to support survey reporting and design.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparing the Attainment of the Patient's Medical Home Model across Regions in Three Canadian Provinces: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2021Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe UK National GP Patient Survey is one of the largest ever survey programmes of patients registered to receive primary health care, inviting five million respondents to report their experience of NHS primary healthcare. The third such annual survey (2008/9) involved the development of a new survey instrument. We describe the process of that development, and the findings of an extensive pilot survey in UK primary healthcare.
methodsThe survey was developed following recognised guidelines and involved expert and stakeholder advice, cognitive testing of early versions of the survey instrument, and piloting of the questionnaire in a cross sectional pilot survey of 1,500 randomly selected individuals from the UK electoral register with two reminders to non-respondents.
resultsThe questionnaire comprises 66 items addressing a range of aspects of UK primary healthcare. A response rate of 590/1500 (39.3%) was obtained. Non response to individual items ranged from 0.8% to 15.3% (median 5.2%). Participants did not always follow internal branching instructions in the questionnaire although electronic controls allow for correction of this problem in analysis. There was marked skew in the distribution of responses to a number of items indicating an overall favourable impression of care. Principal components analysis of 23 items offering evaluation of various aspects of primary care identified three components (relating to doctor or nurse care, or addressing access to care) accounting for 68.3% of the variance in the sample.
conclusionThe GP Patient Survey has been carefully developed and pilot-tested. Survey findings, aggregated at practice level, will be used to inform the distribution of pound sterling 65 million ($107 million) of UK NHS resource in 2008/9 and this offers the opportunity for NHS service planners and providers to take account of users' experiences of health care in planning and delivering primary healthcare in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.