Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19698135›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Identification of novel endogenous antisense transcripts by DNA microarray analysis targeting complementary strand of annotated genes.

Koji Numata, Yuko Osada, Yuki Okada, Rintaro Saito, Noriko Hiraiwa, Hajime Nakaoka, Naoyuki Yamamoto, Kazufumi Watanabe, Kazue Okubo, Chihiro Kohama and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-coding antisense transcripts: fine regulation of gene expression in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  2. Parental bias in expression and interaction of genes in the equine placenta.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Koji NumataTechnology and Development Team for Mammalian Cellular Dynamics, BioResource Center (BRC), RIKEN Tsukuba Institute, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan. koji.numata@gmail.com
Yuko Osada
Yuki Okada
Rintaro Saito
Noriko Hiraiwa
Hajime Nakaoka
Naoyuki Yamamoto
Kazufumi Watanabe
Kazue Okubo
Chihiro Kohama
Akio Kanai
Kuniya Abe
Hidenori Kiyosawa
Yamagata University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPHokkaido Sapporo Kita High School · JPRIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPHokkaido University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent transcriptomic analyses in mammals have uncovered the widespread occurrence of endogenous antisense transcripts, termed natural antisense transcripts (NATs). NATs are transcribed from the opposite strand of the gene locus and are thought to control sense gene expression, but the mechanism of such regulation is as yet unknown. Although several thousand potential sense-antisense pairs have been identified in mammals, examples of functionally characterized NATs remain limited. To identify NAT candidates suitable for further functional analyses, we performed DNA microarray-based NAT screening using mouse adult normal tissues and mammary tumors to target not only the sense orientation but also the complementary strand of the annotated genes.

resultsFirst, we designed microarray probes to target the complementary strand of genes for which an antisense counterpart had been identified only in human public cDNA sources, but not in the mouse. We observed a prominent expression signal from 66.1% of 635 target genes, and 58 genes of these showed tissue-specific expression. Expression analyses of selected examples (Acaa1b and Aard) confirmed their dynamic transcription in vivo. Although interspecies conservation of NAT expression was previously investigated by the presence of cDNA sources in both species, our results suggest that there are more examples of human-mouse conserved NATs that could not be identified by cDNA sources. We also designed probes to target the complementary strand of well-characterized genes, including oncogenes, and compared the expression of these genes between mammary cancerous tissues and non-pathological tissues. We found that antisense expression of 95 genes of 404 well-annotated genes was markedly altered in tumor tissue compared with that in normal tissue and that 19 of these genes also exhibited changes in sense gene expression. These results highlight the importance of NAT expression in the regulation of cellular events and in pathological conditions.

conclusionOur microarray platform targeting the complementary strand of annotated genes successfully identified novel NATs that could not be identified by publically available cDNA data, and as such could not be detected by the usual "sense-targeting" microarray approach. Differentially expressed NATs monitored by this platform may provide candidates for investigations of gene function. An advantage of our microarray platform is that it can be applied to any genes and target samples of interest.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntisense Elements (Genetics)DNA, ComplementaryFemaleHumansMaleMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNIH 3T3 CellsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA, NeoplasmAntisense Elements (Genetics)DNA, ComplementaryRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID19698135
PMCPMC2741491
OpenAlexW2089145449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.