Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19697433›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2009

Multistate study of the epidemiology of clubfoot.

Samantha E Parker, Cara T Mai, Matthew J Strickland, Richard S Olney, Russel Rickard, Lisa Marengo, Ying Wang, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Robert E Meyer, National Birth Defects Prevention Network

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06166238 (Comparative Study Between Millard and Tennison Randall Techniques in Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lip Repair.), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06166238 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Millard and Tennison Randall Techniques in Complete and Incomplete Cleft Lip Repair.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsCleft Lip, UnilateralArmsMillard and Tension Randal Technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of data sources and ascertainment methods on reporting paediatric genetic condition prevalence: A scoping review.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prenatal Counseling for Congenital Clubfoot.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Incidence of Congenital Clubfoot: Preliminary Data from Italian CeDAP Registry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha E ParkerNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. gwf5@cdc.gov
Cara T Mai
Matthew J Strickland
Richard S Olney
Russel Rickard
Lisa Marengo
Ying Wang
S Shahrukh Hashmi
Robert E Meyer
National Birth Defects Prevention Network
Emory University · USTexas Department of State Health Services · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USNew York State Department of Health · USNorth Carolina Division of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough clubfoot is a common birth defect, with a prevalence of approximately 1 per 1000 livebirths, the etiology of clubfoot remains largely unknown. Studies of the prevalence and risk factors for clubfoot in the United States have previously been limited to specific states. The purpose of this study was to pool data from several birth defects surveillance programs to better estimate the prevalence of clubfoot and investigate its risk factors.

methodsThe 10 population-based birth defects surveillance programs that participated in this study ascertained 6139 cases of clubfoot from 2001 through 2005. A random sample of 10 controls per case, matched on year and state of birth, was selected from birth certificates. Data on infant and maternal risk factors were collected from birth certificates. Prevalence was calculated by pooling the state-specific data. Conditional logistic regression was used to investigate the association between risk factors and clubfoot.

resultsThe overall prevalence of clubfoot was 1.29 per 1000 livebirths; 1.38 among non-Hispanic whites, 1.30 among Hispanics, and 1.14 among non-Hispanic blacks or African Americans. Maternal age, parity, education, and marital status were significantly associated with clubfoot. Maternal smoking and diabetes also showed significant associations. Several of these observed associations were consistent between surveillance programs.

conclusionsWe estimated the prevalence of clubfoot using data from several birth defects programs, representing one-quarter of all births in the United States. Our findings underline the importance of birth defects surveillance programs and their utility in monitoring population-based prevalence and investigating risk factors.

Indexed as

AdultBirth CertificatesClubfootFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePopulation SurveillancePrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19697433
OpenAlexW2066048508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.