Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19696958›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2010

Anatomical variations of lumbosacral plexus.

Viktor Matejcík

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Viktor MatejcíkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Derer's Faculty Hospital, Comenius University, Limbova 5, 833 05, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. matejcik@pobox.sk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

basisDeviations detected during spinal operations have motivated us to start research related to variations of lumbosacral plexus formation. Aim of this work was to find out deviations of its formation from ascension of particular roots from foramen invertebrale and foramina sacralia up to formation of terminal branches. SET: One hundred lumbosacral plexi have been examined in 50 adult cadavers for a purpose to find out an incidence of neural variations. We have observed participation of Th(12) root, L(4) and L(5) roots in its formation, as well as various deviations from ascension of particular plexiform roots up to their ending branches. For lumbal plexus, we have observed four nerve roots and six lumbal nerves; for sacral one, three sacral roots with a share of S(4) and lumbosacral trunk formed of L(4) and L(5) roots and four sacral nerves. We have considered also their course, anastomoses and thickness. We highlight motoric innervation particularities in relation to diagnostics besides anatomical complexity and variability.

resultsVariations on the level of neural roots were common, nerve formations were uncommon. Thickness of neural roots, formation or their absence were dependent on the type of plexus, particularly in sacral area. For lumbal plexus, L(1) root was the thinnest and L(4) root was the thickest. L(3) root was the thickest in six cases. Fifth lumbal root usually completely filled foramen invertebrale. We have observed double ascension of L(4) root from foramen invertebrale in 25 cases and plexiform in five cases. In other cases it was branched in various distance following ascension from foramen invertebrale. Plexiform ascension of L(3) root along with L(4) root was present in two cases. Double ascension of L(3) root was present in four cases. L(2), L(3) along with L(5) roots were doubled in two cases. Iliohypogastric nerve was the longest, ilioinguinal was the thinnest and nervus femoralis was the thickest. Changes in sacral plexus on the level of neural roots have been observed 41-times. Double ascension of L(5) root was present in eight cases and plexiform in four cases. Double S(1) root at ascension from foramina sacralia was present 16 times, S(2) 8 times, S(3) once and S(1) along with S(2) 4 times. S(1), S(2) and S(3) roots were branched in various distance following ascension from foramina sacralia in 15 cases. Truncus lumbosacralis was thickened in 19 cases, a share from L(4) root was thicker as L(5) root in 11 cases. Low level of connection between truncus lumbosacralis and S(1) root was observed in 10 cases. Nervus ischiadicus has branched into tibial and peroneal portions already in minor pelvis in two cases. The level of distance of n. (nervus) gluteus superior, n. gluteus inferior, n. cutaneus femoris posterior and n. pudendus was dependent on the plexus type.

conclusionThis study enabled us to find out and to describe extraordinary anatomical deviations in formation of neural roots and nerves of lumbal and sacral plexus, undescribed yet.

Indexed as

AdultCadaverDissectionHumansLumbosacral Plexus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.