Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19696903›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2009

The role of computational fluid dynamics in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a clinicians' view.

Pankaj K Singh, Alberto Marzo, Stuart C Coley, Guntram Berti, Philippe Bijlenga, Patricia V Lawford, Mari-Cruz Villa-Uriol, Daniel A Rufenacht, Keith M McCormack, Alejandro Frangi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pankaj K SinghDepartments of Medical Physics and Neurosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. neurosurgery2007@gmail.com
Alberto Marzo
Stuart C Coley
Guntram Berti
Philippe Bijlenga
Patricia V Lawford
Mari-Cruz Villa-Uriol
Daniel A Rufenacht
Keith M McCormack
Alejandro Frangi
Umang J Patel
D Rodney Hose

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe importance of hemodynamics in the etiopathogenesis of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is widely accepted. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is being used increasingly for hemodynamic predictions. However, alogn with the continuing development and validation of these tools, it is imperative to collect the opinion of the clinicians.

methodsA workshop on CFD was conducted during the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Teaching Course, Lisbon, Portugal. 36 delegates, mostly clinicians, performed supervised CFD analysis for an IA, using the @neuFuse software developed within the European project @neurIST. Feedback on the workshop was collected and analyzed. The performance was assessed on a scale of 1 to 4 and, compared with experts' performance.

resultsCurrent dilemmas in the management of unruptured IAs remained the most important motivating factor to attend the workshop and majority of participants showed interest in participating in a multicentric trial. The participants achieved an average score of 2.52 (range 0-4) which was 63% (range 0-100%) of an expert user.

conclusionsAlthough participants showed a manifest interest in CFD, there was a clear lack of awareness concerning the role of hemodynamics in the etiopathogenesis of IAs and the use of CFD in this context. More efforts therefore are required to enhance understanding of the clinicians in the subject.

Identifiers

PMID19696903
PMCPMC2729101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.