Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19696886›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Spermatogenesis-specific features of the meiotic program in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Diane C Shakes, Jui-Ching Wu, Penny L Sadler, Kristen Laprade, Landon L Moore, Alana Noritake, Diana S Chu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expanding thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Male-specific roles of lincRNA inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diane C ShakesDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA. dcshak@wm.edu
Jui-Ching Wu
Penny L Sadler
Kristen Laprade
Landon L Moore
Alana Noritake
Diana S Chu
San Francisco State University · USWilliam & Mary · USUniversity of Southern Indiana · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

TOXIC METALS IN PLANTS--METAL INDUCED GENE EXPRESSION IN METAL TOLERANT PLANTSS06GM052588 · NIGMS · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ARSUAGA, FRANCISCO JAVIER · 1995 to 2010
$31.2M
METAPHASE TO ANAPHASE TRANSITION IN MITOSIS AND MEIOSISR15GM060359 · NIGMS · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI SHAKES, DIANE C · 2000 to 2003
$245k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM060359NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM60359NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM052588NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM52588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most sexually reproducing organisms, the fundamental process of meiosis is implemented concurrently with two differentiation programs that occur at different rates and generate distinct cell types, sperm and oocytes. However, little is known about how the meiotic program is influenced by such contrasting developmental programs. Here we present a detailed timeline of late meiotic prophase during spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans using cytological and molecular landmarks to interrelate changes in chromosome dynamics with germ cell cellularization, spindle formation, and cell cycle transitions. This analysis expands our understanding C. elegans spermatogenesis, as it identifies multiple spermatogenesis-specific features of the meiotic program and provides a framework for comparative studies. Post-pachytene chromatin of spermatocytes is distinct from that of oocytes in both composition and morphology. Strikingly, C. elegans spermatogenesis includes a previously undescribed karyosome stage, a common but poorly understood feature of meiosis in many organisms. We find that karyosome formation, in which chromosomes form a constricted mass within an intact nuclear envelope, follows desynapsis, involves a global down-regulation of transcription, and may support the sequential activation of multiple kinases that prepare spermatocytes for meiotic divisions. In spermatocytes, the presence of centrioles alters both the relative timing of meiotic spindle assembly and its ultimate structure. These microtubule differences are accompanied by differences in kinetochores, which connect microtubules to chromosomes. The sperm-specific features of meiosis revealed here illuminate how the underlying molecular machinery required for meiosis is differentially regulated in each sex.

Indexed as

MeiosisSpermatogenesisAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMaleSpermatozoaCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19696886
PMCPMC2720455
OpenAlexW2081180142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.