Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19696376›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2010

English proficiency and language preference: testing the equivalence of two measures.

Gilbert C Gee, Katrina M Walsemann, David T Takeuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ALDH2 Deficiency and Alcohol Intake in the United States: Opportunity for Precision Cancer Prevention.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gilbert C GeeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA. gilgee@ucla.edu
Katrina M Walsemann
David T Takeuchi

Funding

NLAAS II: Unraveling Differences for Clinical ServicesU01MH062209 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI ALEGRIA, MARGARITA · 2000 to 2008
$10.6M
NATIONAL LATINO AND ASIAN AMERICAN STUDYU01MH062207 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TAKEUCHI, DAVID T · 2000 to 2004
$7.2M
Therapist Factors Research ProgramP50MH073511 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZANE, NOLAN · 2007 to 2011
$3.8M
CBT Treatment for PTSD and SUDs in Minority YouthK23DA018715 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FORTUNA, LISA R · 2006 to 2010
$743k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA018715NIDA NIH HHS RWJ DA018715NIMH NIH HHS 1050MH073511NIMH NIH HHS MH62207NIMH NIH HHS MH62209NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH073511NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH062207NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH062209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined the association of language proficiency vs language preference with self-rated health among Asian American immigrants. We also examined whether modeling preference or proficiency as continuous or categorical variables changed our inferences.

methodsData came from the 2002-2003 National Latino and Asian American Study (n = 1639). We focused on participants' proficiency in speaking, reading, and writing English and on their language preference when thinking or speaking with family or friends. We examined the relation between language measures and self-rated health with ordered and binary logistic regression.

resultsAll English proficiency measures were associated with self-rated health across all models. By contrast, associations between language preference and self-rated health varied by the model considered.

conclusionsAlthough many studies create composite scores aggregated across measures of English proficiency and language preference, this practice may not always be conceptually or empirically warranted.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth StatusLanguageMultilingualismAcculturationAdultAsianAttitude to HealthData Interpretation, StatisticalEducational StatusEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMorbidity

Identifiers

PMID19696376
PMCPMC2820064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.