ArticleAmerican journal of public health2009
Globalized research and "national science": the case of Peru.
Article in American journal of public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and prospects in mentoring medical scientists in Latin America: a narrative review and recommendations.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- The regulatory and scientific context in the study of the medicinal use of cannabis in Peru.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A review of neurological health disparities in Peru.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Describing and mapping scientific articles on alcohol globally for the period 2010-2021: a bibliometric analysis.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Bridging research integrity and global health epidemiology (BRIDGE) guidelines: explanation and elaboration.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Bridging research integrity and global health epidemiology (BRIDGE) statement: guidelines for good epidemiological practice.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis.Global health research and policy · 2018Review
- Post-approval monitoring and oversight of U.S.-initiated human subjects research in resource-constrained countries.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Issues in the area of international health research are insufficiently discussed in Latin America. We examine the practices of stakeholders such as the state and the academic community regarding research policy processes and funding sources in Peru. Our findings showed that research policy development and evaluation processes are poor in Peru, most of the country's academic research is published in English only, and researchers' access to funding is limited. Given that the relationship between local academic institutions and foreign research centers is key in developing a "national science," there is a clear need to reinforce the state's capacities for management and research oversight and implementation and to encourage the academic community to improve their institutional policies and research frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.