Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19695649›Full record

ReviewPhytochemistry2009

The wound hormone jasmonate.

Abraham J K Koo, Gregg A Howe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Phytochemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
35.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 363 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Arabidopsis GH3.10 conjugates jasmonates.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Evaporative cooling signals for wound healing in plants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abraham J K KooDepartment of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
Gregg A Howe
Michigan State University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF DEFENSE SIGNALING IN TOMATOR01GM057795 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOWE, GREGG A · 1998 to 2012
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057795NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM57795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant tissues are highly vulnerable to injury by herbivores, pathogens, mechanical stress, and other environmental insults. Optimal plant fitness in the face of these threats relies on complex signal transduction networks that link damage-associated signals to appropriate changes in metabolism, growth, and development. Many of these wound-induced adaptive responses are triggered by de novo synthesis of the plant hormone jasmonate (JA). Recent studies provide evidence that JA mediates systemic wound responses through distinct cell autonomous and non-autonomous pathways. In both pathways, bioactive JAs are recognized by an F-box protein-based receptor system that couples hormone binding to ubiquitin-dependent degradation of transcriptional repressor proteins. These results provide a framework for understanding how plants recognize and respond to tissue injury.

Indexed as

Arabidopsis ProteinsCyclopentanesGene Expression Regulation, PlantIsoleucineModels, BiologicalMolecular StructureOxylipinsSignal TransductionArabidopsis ProteinsCyclopentanesIsoleucinejasmonic acidjasmonoyl-isoleucineOxylipins

Identifiers

PMID19695649
PMCPMC2784233
OpenAlexW2047936424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.