Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19694740›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2009

No significant effect of ABCB1 haplotypes on the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin.

Jenni E Keskitalo, Kaisa J Kurkinen, Mikko Neuvonen, Janne T Backman, Pertti J Neuvonen, Mikko Niemi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic factors affecting statin concentrations and subsequent myopathy: a HuGENet systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Racial Disparity in Drug Disposition in the Digestive Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Enantiospecific Pharmacogenomics of Fluvastatin.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenni E KeskitaloDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki FI-00029, Finland.
Kaisa J Kurkinen
Mikko Neuvonen
Janne T Backman
Pertti J Neuvonen
Mikko Niemi
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to investigate possible effects of ABCB1 genotype on fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics.

methodsIn a fixed-order crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers with the ABCB1 c.1236C/C-c.2677G/G-c.3435C/C (CGC/CGC) genotype and 10 with the c.1236T/T-c.2677T/T-c.3435T/T (TTT/TTT) genotype ingested a single 20-mg dose of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin. Plasma fluvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin concentrations were measured up to 12 h and plasma and urine rosuvastatin concentrations up to 48 and 24 h, respectively.

resultsThe ABCB1 genotype had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of any of the investigated statins. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) in participants with the TTT/TTT genotype to that in those with the CGC/CGC genotype was 0.96 (0.77, 1.20; P= 0.737) for fluvastatin, 0.92 (0.53, 1.62; P= 0.772) for pravastatin, 0.83 (0.36, 1.90; P= 0.644) for lovastatin, 1.25 (0.72, 2.17; P= 0.400) for lovastatin acid, and 1.10 (0.73, 1.65; P= 0.626) for rosuvastatin. The AUC(0-infinity) of lovastatin acid correlated significantly with that of rosuvastatin (r= 0.570, P= 0.009), but none of the other AUC(0-infinity) pairs showed a significant correlation.

conclusionsThese data suggest that the ABCB1 c.1236C-c.2677G-c.3435C and c.1236T-c.2677T-c.3435T haplotypes play no significant role in the interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Cross-Over StudiesFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFemaleFluorobenzenesFluvastatinGenotypeHaplotypesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIndolesLovastatinMaleABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Fatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFluorobenzenesFluvastatinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIndolesLovastatinPravastatinPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID19694740
PMCPMC2767284
OpenAlexW2001109335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.