Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19694596›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2009

Designing e-health interventions for low-health-literate culturally diverse parents: addressing the obesity epidemic.

Michael Mackert, LeeAnn Kahlor, Diane Tyler, Jamie Gustafson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. SisterTalk: final results of a culturally tailored cable television delivered weight control program for Black women.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2013
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Profile of the Users and the Most Visited Topics of a Pediatric eHealth Website.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael MackertDepartment of Advertising, The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA. mackert@mail.utexas.edu
LeeAnn Kahlor
Diane Tyler
Jamie Gustafson

Funding

Variables predictive of self care in well elderlyP30NR005051 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI WALKER, LORRAINE O · 1999 to 2008
$3.9M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR005051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child and adolescent obesity is a significant problem contributing to long-term trends in adult obesity. Educating parents about strategies for raising healthy children is complicated by the problem of low health literacy. E-health provides new opportunities to educate lowhealth-literate audiences, and this project was intended as formative research to guide design of interventions for low-health-literate parents. Focus groups were conducted with African American, Hispanic, and white parents (n = 43), 18 years of age or older, and at or below median income for the region. Each focus group included the following: a discussion of parents' general use of the Internet for health information, the demonstration of a Web site designed specifically for low-health-literate users, and asking participants about ideas under consideration for future interventions. Participants use search engines to look for health information and use heuristics, such as position in search results, to evaluate Web site quality. Some participants avoid information from .edu and .gov domains due to perceived complexity, and there was an almost-universal lack of trust in the government for health information. University researchers, by contrast, were trusted sources as information providers. Content and usability that meet the needs of extremely low-literate audiences may be perceived as slow and lacking depth by more literate and Internet-savvy users. E-health can be used to educate low-health-literate audiences, but interventions designed for these users must be layered in terms of content and usability to meet varying levels of functional and media literacy.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityCultureElectronic Health RecordsHealth EducationParentsTelemedicineDiffusion of InnovationDisease OutbreaksEducational StatusFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternetObesityPsychometricsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19694596
PMCPMC2956510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.