Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19693948›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2010

Development and testing of a vaginal pressure sensor to measure intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Evan M Rosenbluth, Paul J Johnson, Robert W Hitchcock, Ingrid E Nygaard

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Design and development of a novel intra-vaginal pressure sensor.International urogynecology journal · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evan M RosenbluthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2101, USA.
Paul J Johnson
Robert W Hitchcock
Ingrid E Nygaard
Marymount University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

WIRELESS REMOTE ABDOMINAL PRESSURE SYSTEM: DEVELOPING A MORE COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSR01HD061787 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NYGAARD, INGRID E · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsElevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for pelvic floor disorders. However, limited evidence exists due to the lack of instruments suitable to measure abdominal pressures in real world settings. The aim of this study was to develop and test a vaginal sensor prototype to measure intra-abdominal pressure in women.

methodsWe developed a non-directional vaginal sensor by housing pressure-sensing circuit boards in 1.2 x 3 cm radially symmetric silicon capsules. We characterized the response in a standardized pressure chamber. Eight women wore a sensor intra-vaginally while undergoing filling cystometry. We compared peak pressures during coughing, valsalva, squatting, and jumping to those obtained using a #10 French rectal balloon urodynamics catheter. We calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients between rectal and vaginal sensors for each event.

resultsThe vaginal sensors exhibited linear responses during initial bench testing. Each transducer correlated well with the rectal balloon catheter during coughing, valsalva, and squatting (r = 0.97, 0.94, and 0.97, respectively). However, the rectal balloon catheter recorded higher peak and lower, often negative, trough pressures during jumping. The vaginal sensor showed no such artifact.

conclusionsThis vaginal pressure sensor can be used as a surrogate for measuring intra-abdominal pressure in women without advanced prolapse. By measuring pressure at the physiological source, the vaginal sensor is less prone to extraneous noise and error than current transducers. Using this prototype, we will next develop a remote wireless version to capture a range of abdominal pressures experienced outside of the laboratory setting.

Indexed as

PressureAbdomenAdultCoughEquipment and SuppliesEquipment DesignExerciseFemaleHumansLinear ModelsPostureRectumUrodynamicsVaginaValsalva Maneuver

Identifiers

PMID19693948
PMCPMC3731207
OpenAlexW2090876150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.