Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19693027›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2009

WNTs tune up the neuromuscular junction.

Ceren Korkut, Vivian Budnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Vps54 regulatesBiology open · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Muscle Yap Is a Regulator of Neuromuscular Junction Formation and Regeneration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Wnt and extraocular muscle sparing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ceren KorkutDepartment of Neurobiology, Aaron Lazare Biomedical Research Building, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.
Vivian Budnik

Funding

The Wingless Transduction Pathway in Synapse DevelopmentR37MH070000 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BUDNIK, VIVIAN G. · 2014 to 2023
$4.2M
The Wingless Transduction Pathway in Synapse DevelopmentR01MH070000 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BUDNIK, VIVIAN G. · 2004 to 2013
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH70000NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070000NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH070000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although WNTs have been long thought of as regulators of cell fate, recent studies highlight their involvement in crucial aspects of synaptic development in the nervous system. Particularly compelling are recent studies of the neuromuscular junction in nematodes, insects, fish and mammals. These studies place WNTs as major determinants of synapse differentiation and neurotransmitter receptor clustering.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeuromuscular JunctionNeuronal PlasticitySignal TransductionSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionWnt ProteinsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19693027
PMCPMC3499984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.