Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19692605›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2009

Neocortical networks entrain neuronal circuits in cerebellar cortex.

Hana Ros, Robert N S Sachdev, Yuguo Yu, Nenad Sestan, David A McCormick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tremor pathophysiology.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Delta Oscillations Coordinate Intracerebellar and Cerebello-Hippocampal Network Dynamics during Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hana RosDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, and Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. h.ros@ucl.ac.uk
Robert N S Sachdev
Yuguo Yu
Nenad Sestan
David A McCormick
Yale University · USUCL Australia · AU

Funding

Neurobiology of Speech and Language DevelopmentR01NS054273 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SESTAN, NENAD · 2005 to 2014
$3.3M
Neurotransmitter Actions in Neocortex and ThalamusR37NS026143 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCORMICK, DAVID · 2005 to 2011
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054273NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS026143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activity in neocortex is often characterized by synchronized oscillations of neurons and networks, resulting in the generation of a local field potential (LFP) and electroencephalogram. Do the neuronal networks of the cerebellum also generate synchronized oscillations and are they under the influence of those in the neocortex? Here we show that, in the absence of any overt external stimulus, the cerebellar cortex generates a slow oscillation that is correlated with that of the neocortex. Disruption of the neocortical slow oscillation abolishes the cerebellar slow oscillation, whereas blocking cerebellar activity has no overt effect on the neocortex. We provide evidence that the cerebellar slow oscillation results in part from the activation of granule, Golgi, and Purkinje neurons. In particular, we show that granule and Golgi cells discharge trains of single spikes, and Purkinje cells generate complex spikes, during the "up" state of the slow oscillation. Purkinje cell simple spiking is weakly related to the cerebellar and neocortical slow oscillation in a minority of cells. Our results indicate that the cerebellum generates rhythmic network activity that can be recorded as an LFP in the anesthetized animal, which is driven by synchronized oscillations of the neocortex. Furthermore, we show that correlations between neocortical and cerebellar LFPs persist in the awake animal, indicating that neocortical circuits modulate cerebellar neurons in a similar manner in natural behavioral states. Thus, the projection neurons of the neocortex collectively exert a driving and modulatory influence on cerebellar network activity.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCerebellar CortexMaleMiceNeocortexNerve NetNeuronsRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID19692605
PMCPMC3137973
OpenAlexW2051057512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.