Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19692590›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2009

Actin machinery and mechanosensitivity in invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions.

Corinne Albiges-Rizo, Olivier Destaing, Bertrand Fourcade, Emmanuelle Planus, Marc R Block

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cancer cell extravasation requiresBritish journal of cancer · 2024
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding Actin Remodeling in Neuronal Cells Through Podosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Development of a culture chamber for mechanical loading of adherent cells with large uniform strain].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Corinne Albiges-RizoINSERM U823 Institut Albert Bonniot, Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS ERL3148, Equipe DySAD, Site Santé, BP 170, Grenoble, France. corinne.albiges-rizo@ujf-grenoble.fr
Olivier Destaing
Bertrand Fourcade
Emmanuelle Planus
Marc R Block
Inserm · FRInstitut pour l'avancée des biosciences · FRUniversité Joseph Fourier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invasiveness of cells is correlated with the presence of dynamic actin-rich membrane structures called invadopodia, which are membrane protrusions that are associated with localized polymerization of sub-membrane actin filaments. Similar to focal adhesions and podosomes, invadopodia are cell-matrix adhesion sites. Indeed, invadopodia share several features with podosomes, but whether they are distinct structures is still a matter of debate. Invadopodia are built upon an N-WASP-dependent branched actin network, and the Rho GTPase Cdc42 is involved in inducing invadopodial-membrane protrusion, which is mediated by actin filaments that are organized in bundles to form an actin core. Actin-core formation is thought to be an early step in invadopodium assembly, and the actin core is perpendicular to the extracellular matrix and the plasma membrane; this contrasts with the tangential orientation of actin stress fibers anchored to focal adhesions. In this Commentary, we attempt to summarize recent insights into the actin dynamics of invadopodia and podosomes, and the forces that are transmitted through these invasive structures. Although the mechanisms underlying force-dependent regulation of invadopodia and podosomes are largely unknown compared with those of focal adhesions, these structures do exhibit mechanosensitivity. Actin dynamics and associated forces might be key elements in discriminating between invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions. Targeting actin-regulatory molecules that specifically promote invadopodium formation is an attractive strategy against cancer-cell invasion.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell Membrane StructuresCellsFocal AdhesionsHumansMechanotransduction, CellularNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19692590
PMCPMC2767377
OpenAlexW2155802295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.