Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19692562›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Proficiency program for real-time PCR diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infections in French hospital laboratories and at the French National Reference Center for Whooping Cough and other Bordetelloses.

Valérie Caro, Nicole Guiso, Corinne Alberti, Sandrine Liguori, Christophe Burucoa, Gérard Couetdic, Florence Doucet-Populaire, Agnès Ferroni, Sophie Papin-Gibaud, Florence Grattard and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Laboratory Diagnosis of Pertussis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Status of pertussis in iran.Jundishapur journal of microbiology · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Valérie CaroInstitut Pasteur, Centre National de Référence (CNR) de la Coqueluche et autres Bordetelloses, Paris, France.
Nicole Guiso
Corinne Alberti
Sandrine Liguori
Christophe Burucoa
Gérard Couetdic
Florence Doucet-Populaire
Agnès Ferroni
Sophie Papin-Gibaud
Florence Grattard
Hélène Réglier-Poupet
Josette Raymond
Catherine Soler
Sylvie Bouchet
Sandrine Charreau
Brigitte Couzon
Isabelle Leymarie
Nicole Tavares
Mathilde Choux
Edouard Bingen
Stéphane Bonacorsi
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRHôpital Nord · FRHôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the support of a ministerial program for innovative and expensive technologies, dedicated to the economic evaluation of laboratory diagnosis of pertussis by real-time PCR, external quality assessment for real-time IS481 PCR was carried out. Coordinated by the National Centre of Reference of Pertussis and other Bordetelloses (NCR), this study aimed to harmonize and to assess the performances of eight participating microbiology hospital laboratories throughout the French territory. Between January 2006 and February 2007, 10 proficiency panels were sent by the NCR (ascending proficiency program), representing a total of 49 samples and including eight panels to analyze and evaluate the global sensitivity and specificity of real-time PCR, one to assess the limit of detection, and one to evaluate nucleic acid extraction methods. As part of the descending proficiency program, extracted DNA from clinical samples was sent by the eight participating laboratories in different panels and analyzed by the NCR. In the ascending proficiency analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR methods were 92.2% and 94.3%, respectively. The limit of detection of the different methods ranged between 0.1 and 1 fg/microl (0.2 to 2 CFU/microl). The nucleic acid extraction methods showed similar performances. During the descending proficiency analysis, performed with 126 samples, the result of the NCR for 15 samples (11.9%) was discordant with the result obtained by the source laboratory. Despite several initial differences, harmonization was easy and performances were homogeneous. However, the risk of false-positive results remains quite high, and we strongly recommend establishment of uniform quality control procedures performed regularly.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchLaboratories, HospitalBacteriological TechniquesBordetella pertussisDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsFranceHumansInfantPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality Assurance, Health CareSensitivity and SpecificityWhooping CoughDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID19692562
PMCPMC2756922
OpenAlexW2097203397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.