Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19692559›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Wild-type MIC distribution and epidemiological cutoff values for Aspergillus fumigatus and three triazoles as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods.

M A Pfaller, D J Diekema, M A Ghannoum, J H Rex, B D Alexander, D Andes, S D Brown, V Chaturvedi, A Espinel-Ingroff, C L Fowler and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibilities ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rationale for a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Susceptible-only Interpretive Breakpoint for Azithromycin.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Mutations inmBio · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Fatal Drug-Resistant Invasive PulmonaryFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic Diversity andAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

M A PfallerMedical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
D J Diekema
M A Ghannoum
J H Rex
B D Alexander
D Andes
S D Brown
V Chaturvedi
A Espinel-Ingroff
C L Fowler
E M Johnson
C C Knapp
M R Motyl
L Ostrosky-Zeichner
D J Sheehan
T J Walsh
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Antifungal Testing Subcommittee
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBbioMérieux (United States) · USCase Western Reserve University · USDuke University Hospital · USHuman BioMolecular Research Institute · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USNew York State Department of Health · USPfizer (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

Treatment of Infections in Immunocompromised ChildrenZIASC006830 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WALSH, THOMAS J. · 2009 to 2009
$2.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species has been standardized by both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Recent studies suggest the emergence of strains of Aspergillus fumigatus with acquired resistance to azoles. The mechanisms of resistance involve mutations in the cyp51A (sterol demethylase) gene, and patterns of azole cross-resistance have been linked to specific mutations. Studies using the EUCAST broth microdilution (BMD) method have defined wild-type (WT) MIC distributions, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs), and cross-resistance among the azoles. We tested a collection of 637 clinical isolates of A. fumigatus for which itraconazole MICs were < or = 2 microg/ml against posaconazole and voriconazole using the CLSI BMD method. An ECV of < or = 1 microg/ml encompassed the WT population of A. fumigatus for itraconazole and voriconazole, whereas an ECV of < or = 0.25 microg/ml was established for posaconazole. Our results demonstrate that the WT distribution and ECVs for A. fumigatus and the mold-active triazoles were the same when determined by the CLSI or the EUCAST BMD method. A collection of 43 isolates for which itraconazole MICs fell outside of the ECV were used to assess cross-resistance. Cross-resistance between itraconazole and posaconazole was seen for 53.5% of the isolates, whereas cross-resistance between itraconazole and voriconazole was apparent in only 7% of the isolates. The establishment of the WT MIC distribution and ECVs for the azoles and A. fumigatus will be useful in resistance surveillance and is an important step toward the development of clinical breakpoints.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTriazolesAntifungal AgentsTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID19692559
PMCPMC2756953
OpenAlexW2152310572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.