Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19691814›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2009

Epinephrine kinetics in septic shock--a means to understand variable catecholamine efficiency?

Enrico Calzia, Michael Georgieff, Markus Huber-Lang, Peter Radermacher

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Enrico CalziaSektion Anästhesiologische Pathopyhsiologie und Verfahrensentwicklung, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Parkstrasse 11, 89073 Ulm, Germany. enrico.calzia@uni-ulm.de
Michael Georgieff
Markus Huber-Lang
Peter Radermacher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-established that the hemodynamic response to infusing catecholamines, the most frequently applied drugs for circulatory support during shock states, may vary markedly within and between individuals. In this context it is striking that only scarce data are available on the pharmacokinetics of catecholamines in critically ill patients. Furthermore, the existing literature comprises fairly equivocal observations. Abboud and colleagues now report that, in patients with septic shock, epinephrine kinetics are linear and its clearance directly depends on body weight and is inversely related to the severity of the disease. The authors conclude that the endogenous adrenal axis hormones do not assume any additional importance.

Indexed as

CatecholaminesEpinephrineHemodynamicsHumansShock, SepticTreatment OutcomeVasoconstrictor AgentsCatecholaminesEpinephrineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID19691814
PMCPMC2750184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.