ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2009
[Treatment of female and male stress urinary incontinence. Current aspects].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Unsolved Clinical Challenge.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A retrospective analysis of perioperative complications associated with retropubic tension-free vaginal tape in 960 women.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- [Cell-based therapy to treat stress urinary incontinence: which cell type at what cost?].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2014Article
- [Management of urinary incontinence after orthotopic urinary diversion].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment options for female and male stress urinary incontinence are continually being developed. In female patients, the effectiveness of suburethral slings has been demonstrated to be equal to classical retropubic Burch colposuspension. A minimally invasive procedure has been approximated through a stepwise enhancement of the retropubic approach, to the transobturator approach, and, finally, to the single-incision sling approach. As a result, surgical options with gender-specific differences have emerged; increasingly different sling systems have been established for male stress urinary incontinence. Further individualization of surgical incontinence treatment can be achieved based on adjustable sling devices. Thus, the use of bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence has been abandoned, and therapeutic options besides the artificial urinary sphincter are now available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.