Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19688066›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2009

Randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of heptaplatin 1-hour infusion and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy comparing with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Hyung Min Jin, Jinmo Yang, Hong Suk Song, Young Rok Do, Hun Mo Ryoo, Joo Seop Chung, Dae Young Zang and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Current clinical applications and future developments of platinum-based anticancer drugs.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pt(IV) Prodrugs with NSAIDs as Axial Ligands.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Monofunctional Platinum(II) Anticancer Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanocarriers for delivery of platinum anticancer drugs.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kyung Hee LeeKorea Cancer Study Group, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.
Myung Soo Hyun
Hoon-Kyo Kim
Hyung Min Jin
Jinmo Yang
Hong Suk Song
Young Rok Do
Hun Mo Ryoo
Joo Seop Chung
Dae Young Zang
Ho-Yeong Lim
Jong Youl Jin
Chang Yeol Yim
Hee Sook Park
Jun Suk Kim
Chang Hak Sohn
Soon Nam Lee
Yeungnam University · KREwha Womans University · KRPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHeptaplatin (Sunpla) is a cisplatin derivative. A phase IIb trial using heptaplatin resulted in a 34% response rate with mild nephrotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase III trial of heptaplatin plus 5-FU compared with cisplatin plus 5-FU in patients with advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred seventy-four patients (heptaplatin, n=88; cisplatin, n=86) from 13 centers were enrolled. The eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with pathologically-proven adenocarcinoma, chemonaive patients, or patients who had received only single adjuvant chemotherapy, and who had a measurable or evaluable lesion. On day 1, heptaplatin (400 mg/m(2)) or cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) was given over 1 hour with 5-FU (1 gm/m(2)) on days 1~5 every 4 weeks.

resultsAt the time of survival analysis, the median overall survival was 7.3 months in the 5-FU + heptaplatin (FH) arm and 7.9 months in the 5-FU + cisplatin (FP) arm (p=0.24). Of the FH patients, 34.2% (complete response [CR], 1.3%; partial response [PR], 32.9%) experienced a confirmed objective response compared with 35.9% (CR 0%, PR 35.9%) of FP patients (p=0.78). The median-time-to-progression was 2.5 months in the FH arm and 2.3 months in the FP arm. The incidence of neutropenia was higher with FP (28%) than with FH (16%; p=0.06); grade 3~4 nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the FP than in the FH arm (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). The incidence of increased proteinuria and creatininemia was higher with FH than with FP; however, there was no statistical difference. There were no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionHeptaplatin showed similar effects to cisplatin when combined with 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer patients with tolerable toxicities.

Indexed as

Advanced gastric cancerCombination chemotherapyHeptaplatin

Identifiers

PMID19688066
PMCPMC2699097
OpenAlexW2015064273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.