Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19686648›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer.

Erin L Baker, Roger T Bonnecaze, Muhammad H Zaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanomechanical Hallmarks ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in novel targeting mechanisms for colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Harnessing quantum light for microscopic biomechanical imaging of cells and tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. mTOR Signaling Components in Tumor Mechanobiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erin L BakerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Roger T Bonnecaze
Muhammad H Zaman

Funding

Quantitative Analysis of Tumor Cell Migration in Three Dimensioinal MatricesR01CA132633 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ANSETH, KRISTI S., ZAMAN, MUHAMMAD HAMID · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA132633-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the complex interplay between the extracellular mechanical environment and the mechanical properties that characterize the dynamic intracellular environment. To elucidate this relationship in cancer, we probe the intracellular environment using particle-tracking microrheology. In three-dimensional (3D) matrices, intracellular effective creep compliance of prostate cancer cells is shown to increase with increasing extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, whereas modulating ECM stiffness does not significantly affect the intracellular mechanical state when cells are attached to two-dimensional (2D) matrices. Switching from 2D to 3D matrices induces an order-of-magnitude shift in intracellular effective creep compliance and apparent elastic modulus. However, for a given matrix stiffness, partial blocking of beta1 integrins mitigates the shift in intracellular mechanical state that is invoked by switching from a 2D to 3D matrix architecture. This finding suggests that the increased cell-matrix engagement inherent to a 3D matrix architecture may contribute to differences observed in viscoelastic properties between cells attached to 2D matrices and cells embedded within 3D matrices. In total, our observations show that ECM stiffness and architecture can strongly influence the intracellular mechanical state of cancer cells.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixMechanotransduction, CellularModels, BiologicalCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorComputer SimulationElastic ModulusHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsStress, MechanicalViscosity

Identifiers

PMID19686648
PMCPMC2726313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.