Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19686252›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2009

Public health systems: a social networks perspective.

Douglas R Wholey, Walter Gregg, Ira Moscovice

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating Community Partnerships Addressing Community Resilience in Los Angeles, California.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  12. Voice of the Clinician: the case of an Australian health system.Journal of health organization and management · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas R WholeyDivision of Health Policy & Management, University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0392, USA. Whole001@umn.edu
Walter Gregg
Ira Moscovice

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the relationship between public health system network density and organizational centrality in public health systems and public health governance, community size, and health status in three public health domains. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingDuring the fall and the winter of 2007-2008, primary data were collected on the organization and composition of eight rural public health systems. STUDY

designMultivariate analysis and network graphical tools are used in a case comparative design to examine public health system network density and organizational centrality in the domains of adolescent health, senior health, and preparedness. Differences associated with public health governance (centralized, decentralized), urbanization (micropolitan, noncore), health status, public health domain, and collaboration area are described. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsSite visit interviews with key informants from local organizations and a web-based survey administered to local stakeholders. PRINCIPAL

findingsGovernance, urbanization, public health domain, and health status are associated with public health system network structures. The centrality of local health departments (LHDs) varies across public health domains and urbanization. Collaboration is greater in assessment, assurance, and advocacy than in seeking funding.

conclusionsIf public health system organization is causally related to improved health status, studying individual system components such as LHDs will prove insufficient for studying the impact of public health systems.

Indexed as

Health StatusPublic Health AdministrationPublic Health PracticeAdolescentAgedCommunity NetworksHumansMultivariate AnalysisResidence CharacteristicsRural Health ServicesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19686252
PMCPMC2758409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.