Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19684637›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010

Utility of early versus late fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of new pulmonary infiltrates following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

V R Shannon, B S Andersson, X Lei, R E Champlin, D P Kontoyiannis

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01328873 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Utility of Emerging Laboratory Assessments Used in Conjunction With FOB in HSCT and Leukemia Patients With Acute Respiratory Symptoms and Pulmonary Infiltrates

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthside Hospital, Inc.Ran2011 to 2017Enrolled49ConditionsPulmonary Infiltrate NewArmsMicrobiological analysis
NCT03168815 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Low-Flow vs. High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemic Immunocompromised Patients During Diagnostic Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2018 to 2025Enrolled98ConditionsImmunocompromised, Hematologic Malignancy, Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, HypoxiaArmsHigh Flow Nasal Cannula or Low Flow Nasal Cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plasma Microbial Cell-free DNA Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases Among High-risk Outpatient and Inpatient Immunocompromised Hosts.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in Immunocompromised Patients With Pneumonia: A Prospective Observational Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V R ShannonDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. vshannon@mdanderson.org
B S Andersson
X Lei
R E Champlin
D P Kontoyiannis
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary infiltrates frequently complicate hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). The utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in the evaluation of new pulmonary infiltrates, particularly as it relates to optimal timing of the procedure, is unclear. Based on this, we retrospectively reviewed 501 consecutive, adult, nonintubated patients who underwent 598 BALs for evaluation of new pulmonary infiltrates during the first 100 days following HSCT to determine whether diagnostic yields for infection, subsequent antimicrobial treatment modifications and patient outcomes differed following early vs late referrals for the procedure. The overall yield of BAL for clinically significant pathogens was 55%. Notably, the yield was 2.5-fold higher among FOBs performed within the first 4 days of presentation (early FOB) compared to those performed late, and highest (75%) when performed within 24 h of clinical presentation. Rates of FOB-guided adjustments in antimicrobial therapy (51%) did not differ significantly between early and late examinations. However, late FOB-related antibiotic adjustments were associated with 30-day pulmonary-associated deaths that were threefold higher (6 vs 18%, P=0.0351). Major FOB-related complications occurred in only three (0.6%) patients. We conclude that early referral for FOB in this patient setting is associated with higher diagnostic yields and may favorably impact survival.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyDelayed DiagnosisAdultAntibiotic ProphylaxisBronchoalveolar LavageFemaleFiber Optic TechnologyHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMalePneumonia, BacterialPneumonia, PneumocystisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19684637
OpenAlexW2032271794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.