Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19684334›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2009

Expression of human MUC1 during early pregnancy in the human MUC1 transgenic mouse model.

Neeraja Dharmaraj, Sandra J Gendler, Daniel D Carson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Diethylstilbestrol on Implantation and Decidualization in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Post-Acquisition HyperpolarizedDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MUC1 (CD227): a multi-tasked molecule.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neeraja DharmarajDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Sandra J Gendler
Daniel D Carson
University of Delaware · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

GLYCOPROTEIN MARKERS OF UTERINE RECEPTIVITYR01HD029963 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI CARSON, DANIEL D. · 1999 to 2010
$2.1M
GLYCOPROTEIN MARKERS OF UTERINE RECEPTIVITYU01HD029963 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CARSON, DANIEL D. · 1993 to 2005
$810k
NICHD NIH HHS HD 29963NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029963NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD029963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryo implantation involves direct interaction of the blastocyst with the luminal epithelium of the receptive uterus. MUC1, a transmembrane mucin expressed at the apical surface of uterine epithelia, acts as a barrier to microbial infection and enzymatic attack. Loss of MUC1 is believed to be a prerequisite for a functionally receptive uterus across many species. Human and murine MUC1 regulation by steroid hormones displays important differences. Estrogen (E2) stimulates MUC1 expression in mice, and progesterone (P4) antagonizes E2 action in this regard. MUC1 expression is severely reduced during the receptive uterine state in mice. In contrast, human MUC1 expression is maximal at the receptive or midluteal phase, when P4 levels are high. No information is available regarding regulation of human MUC1 in vivo at the site of embryo attachment. Our aim was to better understand regulation of human MUC1 during early pregnancy in vivo. For this purpose, we used a transgenic mouse carrying full-length human MUC1 gene (Tg(MUC1)79.24Gend) as well as endogenous MUC1 as a model system. Human MUC1 was detected by real-time RT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry during early pregnancy. Our data indicate that human MUC1 persists at reduced (20% relative to Day 1 postcoitum) levels in receptive-phase uteri, including the site of embryo attachment. In contrast, mouse MUC1 was much more severely (>98% relative to Day 1 postcoitum) reduced in the same context. These observations are consistent with distinct regulation between the human and mouse genes. Because these genes are expressed in the same transcriptional context (i.e., mouse uterine epithelia), structural differences between human and murine genes must account for these differences in MUC1 regulation.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, AnimalAnimalsBlotting, WesternEmbryo ImplantationEndometriumEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMice, TransgenicMucin-1PregnancyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionMucin-1RNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19684334
PMCPMC2802228
OpenAlexW2131411890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.