Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19684134›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2009

Rbf promotes biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus via repression of icaR, a negative regulator of icaADBC.

David Cue, Mei G Lei, Thanh T Luong, Lisa Kuechenmeister, Paul M Dunman, Sinead O'Donnell, Sarah Rowe, James P O'Gara, Chia Y Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ImagingmBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Pathogenicity Mechanisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Characterization of Ssc, anJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  10. Natural compounds in the fight againstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Effect of Essential Oil fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Regulation ofPharmaceutics · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of SomeInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Dynamics of a Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis simulation model.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David CueDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, Slot 511, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Mei G Lei
Thanh T Luong
Lisa Kuechenmeister
Paul M Dunman
Sinead O'Donnell
Sarah Rowe
James P O'Gara
Chia Y Lee
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by RbfR01AI067857 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI LEE, CHIA Y. · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI067857NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported the identification of a gene, rbf, involved in the regulation of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. In an effort to study the mechanism of regulation, microarrays were used to compare the transcription profiles of the wild-type strain with an rbf mutant and an rbf overexpression strain of the clinical isolate UAMS-1. Among the genes affected by rbf overexpression are those of the intercellular adhesion (ica) locus; however, expression of these genes was not affected by an rbf deletion in the chromosome. The icaADBC genes are responsible for production of poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG), a major constituent of biofilm. The icaR gene encodes a negative regulator of icaADBC. In UAMS-1 carrying an Rbf-encoding plasmid, Rbf was found to repress icaR transcription with a concomitant increase in icaADBC expression and increased PNAG and biofilm production relative to isogenic strains lacking the plasmid. Sequencing of the rbf gene from UAMS-1 showed that there was a 2-bp insertion affecting the 50th codon of the rbf open reading frame, suggesting that rbf is a pseudogene in UAMS-1. This finding explains why deletion of rbf had no effect on biofilm formation in UAMS-1. To further characterize the Rbf regulation on biofilm we compared biofilm formation, icaA and icaR transcription, and PNAG production in 8325-4 and its isogenic rbf and icaR single mutants and an rbf icaR double mutant. Our results are consistent with a model wherein rbf represses synthesis of icaR, which in turn results in derepression of icaADBC and increased PNAG production. Furthermore, purified rbf did not bind to the icaR or icaA promoter region, suggesting that rbf controls expression of an unknown factor(s) that represses icaR. The role of rbf in controlling the S. aureus biofilm phenotype was further demonstrated in a clinical strain, MW2.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiofilmsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMultigene FamilyStaphylococcus aureusUp-RegulationBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19684134
PMCPMC2753044
OpenAlexW2108754827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.