Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19683779›Full record

ArticleVirology2009

Recombinant receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein expressed in mammalian, insect and E. coli cells elicits potent neutralizing antibody and protective immunity.

Lanying Du, Guangyu Zhao, Chris C S Chan, Shihui Sun, Min Chen, Zhonghua Liu, Hongxiang Guo, Yuxian He, Yusen Zhou, Bo-Jian Zheng and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lanying DuLindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Guangyu Zhao
Chris C S Chan
Shihui Sun
Min Chen
Zhonghua Liu
Hongxiang Guo
Yuxian He
Yusen Zhou
Bo-Jian Zheng
Shibo Jiang
New York Blood Center · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HKInstitute of Microbiology · CN

Funding

SARS-CoV S Protein Receptor-binding Domain-based VaccinesR01AI068002 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI JIANG, SHIBO · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068002NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI68002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a newly emerging infectious disease. The potential recurrence of the disease from animal reservoirs highlights the significance of development of safe and efficient vaccines to prevent a future SARS epidemic. In this study, we expressed the recombinant receptor-binding domain (rRBD) in mammalian (293T) cells, insect (Sf9) cells, and E. coli, respectively, and compared their immunogenicity and protection against SARS-CoV infection in an established mouse model. Our results show that all rRBD proteins expressed in the above systems maintained intact conformation, being able to induce highly potent neutralizing antibody responses and complete protective immunity against SARS-CoV challenge in mice, albeit the rRBD expressed in 293T cells elicited stronger humoral immune responses with significantly higher neutralizing activity (P<0.05) than those expressed in Sf9 and E. coli cells. These results suggest that all three rRBDs are effective in eliciting immune responses and protection against SARS-CoV and any of the above expression systems can be used for production of rRBD-based SARS subunit vaccines. Preference will be given to rRBD expressed in mammalian cells for future evaluation of the vaccine efficacy in a non-human primate model of SARS because of its ability to refold into a native conformation more readily and to induce higher level of neutralizing antibody responses than those expressed in E. coli and insect cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralCell LineCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliFemaleGene ExpressionInsectaMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeutralization TestsSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SubunitAntibodies, ViralMembrane GlycoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticViral Envelope ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19683779
PMCPMC2753736
OpenAlexW2054609914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.