ArticleJournal of molecular biology2009
Identification of a mechanical rheostat in the hydrophobic core of protein L.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building block aspect ratio controls assembly, architecture, and mechanics of synthetic and natural protein networks.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Tension-tuned receptors for synthetic mechanotransduction and intercellular force detection.Nature biotechnology · 2023Article
- Tuning Protein Hydrogel Mechanics through Modulation of Nanoscale Unfolding and Entanglement in Postgelation Relaxation.ACS nano · 2022Article
- Protein nanomechanics in biological context.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Free-energy changes of bacteriorhodopsin point mutants measured by single-molecule force spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Mechanism for the Unfolding of the TOP7 Protein in Steered Molecular Dynamics Simulations as Revealed by Mutual Information Analysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Next Generation Methods for Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy on Polyproteins and Receptor-Ligand Complexes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
- A peptide-display protein scaffold to facilitate single molecule force studies of aggregation-prone peptides.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- Force-induced remodelling of proteins and their complexes.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015Review
- Recent applications of boxed molecular dynamics: a simple multiscale technique for atomistic simulations.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2014Article
- Single-molecule studies on PolySUMO proteins reveal their mechanical flexibility.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- A force-activated trip switch triggers rapid dissociation of a colicin from its immunity protein.PLoS biology · 2013Article
- The molecular mechanism underlying mechanical anisotropy of the protein GB1.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Engineered bi-histidine metal chelation sites map the structure of the mechanical unfolding transition state of an elastomeric protein domain GB1.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Engineering proteins with enhanced mechanical stability by force-specific sequence motifs.Proteins · 2012Article
- Prying open single GroES ring complexes by force reveals cooperativity across domains.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Mechanical unfolding studies of protein molecules.Biophysics (Nagoya-shi, Japan) · 2012Review
- Variation in the mechanical unfolding pathway of p53DBD induced by interaction with p53 N-terminal region or DNA.PloS one · 2012Article
- Dynamics of protein folding and cofactor binding monitored by single-molecule force spectroscopy.Biophysical journal · 2011Article
- Mechanically unfolding protein L using a laser-feedback-controlled cantilever.Biophysical journal · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of proteins and their complexes to withstand or respond to mechanical stimuli is vital for cells to maintain their structural organisation, to relay external signals and to facilitate unfolding and remodelling. Force spectroscopy using the atomic force microscope allows the behaviour of single protein molecules under an applied extension to be investigated and their mechanical strength to be quantified. protein L, a simple model protein, displays moderate mechanical strength and is thought to unfold by the shearing of two mechanical sub-domains. Here, we investigate the importance of side-chain packing for the mechanical strength of protein L by measuring the mechanical strength of a series of protein L variants containing single conservative hydrophobic volume deletion mutants. Of the five thermodynamically destabilized variants characterised, only one residue (I60 V) close to the interface between two mechanical sub-domains was found to differ in mechanical properties to wild type (Delta F(I60 V-WT)=-36 pN at 447 nm s(-1), Delta x(uI60V-WT)=0.2 nm). Phi-value analysis of the unfolding data revealed a highly native transition state. To test whether the number of hydrophobic contacts across the mechanical interface does affect the mechanical strength of protein L, we measured the mechanical properties of two further variants. protein L L10F, which increases core packing but does not enhance interfacial contacts, increased mechanical strength by 13+/-11 pN at 447 nm s(-1). By contrast, protein L I60F, which increases both core and cross-interface contacts, increased mechanical strength by 72+/-13 pN at 447 nm s(-1). These data suggest a method by which nature can evolve a varied mechanical response from a limited number of topologies and demonstrate a generic but facile method by which the mechanical strength of proteins can be rationally modified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.