Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19682990›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2009

Engraftment of embryonic stem cell-derived myogenic progenitors in a dominant model of muscular dystrophy.

Radbod Darabi, June Baik, Mark Clee, Michael Kyba, Rossella Tupler, Rita C R Perlingeiro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Myogenic progenitor specification from pluripotent stem cells.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  5. Coaxing stem cells for skeletal muscle repair.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Stem cells for skeletal muscle regeneration: therapeutic potential and roadblocks.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The emerging biology of muscle stem cells: implications for cell-based therapies.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Concise review: stem cell therapy for muscular dystrophies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Stem cells for skeletal muscle repair.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Radbod DarabiDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
June Baik
Mark Clee
Michael Kyba
Rossella Tupler
Rita C R Perlingeiro
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · USUniversity of Minnesota · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Skeletal Muscle Regeneration from Differentiating Pluripotent Stem CellsR01AR055299 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PERLINGEIRO, RITA C. R. · 2008 to 2018
$3.3M
An Animal model to develop therapeutic strategies for FSHDR01AR056129 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI TUPLER, ROSSELLA G · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Skeletal Muscle Regeneration from Pluripotent Stem CellsR56AR055299 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PERLINGEIRO, RITA C. R. · 2020 to 2020
$424k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR055299NIAMS NIH HHS AR056129NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055299NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056129NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR055299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscular dystrophies (MDs) consist of a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders, recessive or dominant, characterized by progressive skeletal muscle weakening. To date, no effective treatment is available. Experimental strategies pursuing muscle regeneration through the transplantation of stem cell preparations have brought hope to patients affected by this disorder. Efficacy has been demonstrated in recessive MD models through contribution of wild-type nuclei to the muscle fiber heterokaryon; however, to date, there has been no study investigating the efficacy of a cell therapy in a dominant model of MD. We have recently demonstrated that Pax3-induced embryonic stem (ES) cell-derived myogenic progenitors are able to engraft and improve muscle function in mdx mice, a recessive mouse model for Duchenne MD. To assess whether this therapeutic effect can be extended to a dominant type of muscle disorder, here we transplanted these cells into FRG1 transgenic mice, a dominant model that has been associated with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Our results show that Pax3-induced ES-derived myogenic progenitors are capable of significant engraftment after intramuscular or systemic transplantation into Frg1 mice. Analyses of contractile parameters revealed functional improvement in treated muscles of male mice, but not females, which are less severely affected. This study is the first to use Frg1 transgenic mice to assess muscle regeneration as well as to support the use of a cell-based therapy for autosomal dominant types of MD.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGenes, DominantIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMiceMice, TransgenicMicrofilament ProteinsMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalMuscle WeaknessMuscular Dystrophy, AnimalNuclear ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsFRG1 protein, humanIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPax3 protein, mousePAX3 Transcription FactorRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19682990
PMCPMC2761496
OpenAlexW2074478069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.