ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2009
A label-free mass spectrometry method for the quantification of protein isotypes.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two predominant MUPs, OBP3 and MUP13, are male pheromones in rats.Frontiers in zoology · 2018Article
- Regulation of highly homologous major urinary proteins in house mice quantified with label-free proteomic methods.Molecular bioSystems · 2016Article
- A label-free mass spectrometry method for relative quantitation of β-tubulin isotype expression in human tumor tissue.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2012Article
- Methods in tubulin proteomics.Methods in cell biology · 2010Review
- Quantitative Proteomics: Recent Advances in Glomerular Disease and Nephrotic Syndrome.Glomerular diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Successful quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) requires strategies to link the mass spectrometer response to the analyte abundance, with the response being dependent on more factors than just analyte abundance. Label-dependent strategies rely on the incorporation of an isotopically labeled internal standard into the sample. Current label-free strategies (performed without internal standards) are useful for analyzing samples that are unsuitable for isotopic labeling but are less accurate. Here we describe a label-free technique applicable to analysis of products from related genes (isotypes). This approach enables the invariant tryptic peptide sequences within the family to serve as "built-in" internal standards and the isotype-specific peptide sequences to report the amount of the various isotypes. A process of elimination segregates reliably trypsin-released standard and reporter peptides from unreliably released peptides. The specific MS response factors for these reporter and standard peptides can be determined using synthetic peptides. Analysis of HeLa tubulin digests revealed peptides from betaI-, betaII-, betaIII-, betaIVb-, and betaV-tubulin, eight of which were suitable; along with five standard peptides for quantification of the beta-tubulin isotypes. To show the utility of this method, we determined that betaI-tubulin represented 77% and betaIII-tubulin represented 3.2% of the total HeLa beta-tubulin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.